Talk:Sports Illustrated

Why should these writers be on the page as opposed to other SI writers? -Umbreon9 (talk) 23:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Why remove valid information? Jeff (talk) 23:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Because it's not complete enough to serve any practical or educational purpose. -Umbreon9 (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Do we have pages for any of the others? Add them in. Jeff (talk)

There are too many writers, and not enough listed. Expanding the history section would enhance the article more. The links to a few of the most prominent writers could be added in Further Reading. -Umbreon9 (talk) 01:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

You are welcome to expand the article. There is nothing wrong with a representative list of writers for which we have articles; we do this for articles on all sorts of other newspapers and magazines, although this normally takes the form of a straightforward (i.e. not bulletized) list. Given S.I.'s prominence, however, the list here is longer than most. The "Further Reading" section would be for books and articles about the publication, not for content from S.I. Philippe (talk) 12:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)