Rankings of Negro League players should consider that Negro League data is not complete. Research is still ongoing and we’ll continue to publish updates as more information becomes available. Negro Leagues Data: Frequently Asked Questions (NEW)

Negro National League II Fielding Leaders

Putouts
1. Leonard • HG 642
2. West • PS 478
3. Barbee • BEG 335
4. Pearson • NE 322
5. Gibson • HG 298
Assists
1. Bankhead • HG 227
2. Easterling • HG 144
3. Snow • TOT 128
4. Russell • BEG 106
5. Wilson • HG 100
Errors Committed
1. Wilson • HG 18
2. Young • BEG 17
3. Russell • BEG 16
Baker • NBY 16
5. Doby • NE 15
Watkins • NE 15
Def. Games as C
1. Gibson • HG 62
2. Cash • PS 43
3. Clarke • TOT 42
4. Louden • NYC 29
5. Ruffin • NE 28
Putouts as C
1. Gibson • HG 283
2. Clarke • TOT 215
3. Cash • PS 175
4. Ruffin • NE 162
5. Louden • NYC 136
Assists as C
1. Cash • PS 31
Gibson • HG 31
3. Clarke • TOT 27
4. Ruffin • NE 24
5. Louden • NYC 19
Errors Committed as C
1. Clarke • TOT 10
2. Gray • HAR 6
Kemp • NBY 6
4. Cash • PS 5
Gibson • HG 5
Double Plays Turned as C
1. Cash • PS 3
2. Gibson • HG 1
Louden • NYC 1
Palm • NBY 1
Robinson • BEG 1
Ruffin • NE 1
Clarke • TOT 1
Passed Balls
1. Kemp • NBY 8
2. Gibson • HG 5
3. Gray • HAR 3
Louden • NYC 3
Palm • NBY 3
Robinson • BEG 3
Stolen Bases Allowed as C
1. Clarke • TOT 21
2. Kemp • NBY 18
3. Robinson • BEG 15
4. Palm • NBY 13
Gray • HAR 13
Def. Games as 1B
1. Leonard • HG 67
2. West • PS 49
3. Barbee • BEG 41
4. Pearson • NE 32
5. Thomas • NYC 29
Putouts as 1B
1. Leonard • HG 642
2. West • PS 478
3. Barbee • BEG 335
4. Pearson • NE 317
5. Thomas • NYC 267
Assists as 1B
1. Leonard • HG 31
2. West • PS 25
3. Pearson • NE 20
4. Barbee • BEG 18
5. Clayton • NBY 10
Thomas • NYC 10
Errors Committed as 1B
1. West • PS 13
2. Leonard • HG 12
3. Barbee • BEG 11
4. Pearson • NE 5
5. Clayton • NBY 4
Double Plays Turned as 1B
1. Leonard • HG 40
2. Pearson • NE 23
3. Barbee • BEG 19
4. Thomas • NYC 18
5. Linares • NYC 8
Def. Games as 2B
1. Easterling • HG 48
2. Russell • BEG 30
3. Pérez • NYC 26
4. Spencer • TOT 22
5. Ford • TOT 21
Putouts as 2B
1. Easterling • HG 94
2. Russell • BEG 69
3. Pérez • NYC 57
4. Doby • NE 50
5. Ford • TOT 45
Assists as 2B
1. Easterling • HG 131
2. Russell • BEG 77
3. Pérez • NYC 70
4. Ford • TOT 68
5. Doby • NE 61
Errors Committed as 2B
1. Russell • BEG 10
2. Spencer • TOT 8
3. Fagan • TOT 6
Easterling • HG 6
5. Doby • NE 5
Day • TOT 5
Morton • PS 5
Double Plays Turned as 2B
1. Pérez • NYC 16
2. Easterling • HG 13
3. Doby • NE 11
4. Spencer • TOT 7
5. Day • TOT 6
Def. Games as 3B
1. Wilson • HG 58
2. Spearman • PS 47
3. Cox • NYC 29
4. Watkins • NE 28
5. Russell • BEG 20
Putouts as 3B
1. Spearman • PS 63
2. Wilson • HG 62
3. Watkins • NE 38
4. Cox • NYC 29
5. Russell • BEG 17
Assists as 3B
1. Wilson • HG 96
2. Spearman • PS 93
3. Watkins • NE 61
4. Cox • NYC 53
5. Scales • BEG 29
Russell • BEG 29
Errors Committed as 3B
1. Wilson • HG 15
2. Spearman • PS 11
3. Watkins • NE 10
4. Miller • NBY 6
Russell • BEG 6
Double Plays Turned as 3B
1. Cox • NYC 7
2. Watkins • NE 6
3. Wilson • HG 4
4. Russell • BEG 3
5. Scales • BEG 2
Williams • HAR 2
Def. Games as SS
1. Bankhead • HG 71
2. Martínez • NYC 30
3. Baker • NBY 29
4. Snow • TOT 26
5. Duckett • PS 14
Putouts as SS
1. Bankhead • HG 182
2. Martínez • NYC 77
3. Snow • TOT 74
4. Baker • NBY 59
5. Morton • PS 32
Assists as SS
1. Bankhead • HG 227
2. Martínez • NYC 88
3. Baker • NBY 74
4. Snow • TOT 72
5. Duckett • PS 36
Errors Committed as SS
1. Young • BEG 15
2. Baker • NBY 14
3. Snow • TOT 11
4. Doby • NE 10
5. Bankhead • HG 9
Double Plays Turned as SS
1. Bankhead • HG 29
2. Martínez • NYC 13
3. Snow • TOT 9
4. Richardson • NE 7
5. Baker • NBY 5
Def. Games as LF (s.1901)
1. Bell • HG 57
2. Parnell • PS 35
3. Hoskins • BEG 34
4. Brooks • NYC 17
5. Harvey • NE 15
Putouts as LF (s.1901)
1. Bell • HG 81
2. Hoskins • BEG 65
3. Parnell • PS 50
4. Bradford • NBY 28
5. Linares • NYC 27
Assists as LF (s.1901)
1. Hoskins • BEG 6
2. Sydnor • NYC 4
Parnell • PS 4
4. Williams • NBY 3
Bell • HG 3
Errors Committed as LF (s.1901)
1. Parnell • PS 8
2. Christopher • BEG 3
3. Fitzgerald • NE 2
Griffith • NBY 2
Hoskins • BEG 2
Double Plays Turned as LF (s.1901)
1. Bell • HG 1
Bradford • NBY 1
Griffith • NBY 1
Hoskins • BEG 1
Jones • BEG 1
Parnell • PS 1
Def. Games as CF (s.1901)
1. Benjamin • HG 64
2. Kimbro • BEG 45
3. Benson • PS 44
4. Vargas • NYC 30
5. Davis • NE 25
Putouts as CF (s.1901)
1. Benjamin • HG 144
2. Benson • PS 115
3. Kimbro • BEG 100
4. Vargas • NYC 56
5. Davis • NE 39
Assists as CF (s.1901)
1. Kimbro • BEG 7
2. Barker • NBY 6
3. Vargas • NYC 4
4. Benjamin • HG 3
5. Davis • NE 2
Armour • TOT 2
Errors Committed as CF (s.1901)
1. Benson • PS 5
2. Barker • NBY 4
Kimbro • BEG 4
4. Byrd • BEG 3
5. Benjamin • HG 2
Bradford • NBY 2
Double Plays Turned as CF (s.1901)
1. Kimbro • BEG 1
Vargas • NYC 1
Def. Games as RF (s.1901)
1. Curry • PS 35
Coimbre • NYC 35
3. Harris • HG 30
4. Brown • HG 23
5. Jones • BEG 16
Putouts as RF (s.1901)
1. Coimbre • NYC 47
2. Curry • PS 45
3. Harris • HG 35
4. Jones • BEG 23
5. Adams • NBY 20
Assists as RF (s.1901)
1. Curry • PS 6
2. Harris • HG 5
3. Harvey • BEG 4
4. Brown • HG 3
Leonard • NBY 3
Errors Committed as RF (s.1901)
1. Coimbre • NYC 4
2. Brown • HG 3
Wright • NBY 3
Harvey • BEG 3
Harris • HG 3
Double Plays Turned as RF (s.1901)
1. Harris • HG 1
Stone • TOT 1
Putouts as OF
1. Benjamin • HG 154
2. Benson • PS 115
3. Kimbro • BEG 100
4. Bell • HG 94
5. Hoskins • BEG 65
Assists as OF
1. Curry • PS 8
2. Kimbro • BEG 7
3. Barker • NBY 6
Hoskins • BEG 6
Harris • HG 6
Errors Committed as OF
1. Parnell • PS 8
2. Benson • PS 5
3. Barker • NBY 4
Harvey • BEG 4
Kimbro • BEG 4
Coimbre • NYC 4
Wright • NBY 4
Christopher • TOT 4
Double Plays Turned as OF
1. Bell • HG 1
Bradford • NBY 1
Griffith • NBY 1
Harris • HG 1
Hoskins • BEG 1
Jones • BEG 1
Kimbro • BEG 1
Parnell • PS 1
Vargas • NYC 1
Stone • TOT 1
Def. Games as P
1. Wright • HG 30
2. Walker • HG 21
Carter • HG 21
4. Glover • BEG 19
Byrd • TOT 19
Putouts as P
1. Byrd • TOT 8
2. Brown • PS 5
3. Evans • TOT 4
Walker • HG 4
Day • NE 4
Assists as P
1. Byrd • TOT 42
2. Wright • HG 39
3. Barnhill • NYC 36
Walker • HG 36
5. Glover • BEG 29
Errors Committed as P
1. Boone • HAR 5
2. Barnhill • NYC 4
3. Forrest • NBY 3
Porter • BEG 3
Harvey • BEG 3
Griffith • NBY 3
Anderson • TOT 3
Double Plays Turned as P
1. Byrd • TOT 4
2. Hill • NE 2
Wright • HG 2
4. Barker • NBY 1
Barnhill • NYC 1
Crue • NYC 1
Keyes • PS 1
Stanley • NBY 1
Evans • TOT 1
Range Factor/9Inn as C
1. Ruffin • NE 7.22
2. Clarke • TOT 6.46
3. Louden • NYC 6.12
4. Gibson • HG 5.66
5. Cash • PS 4.98
Range Factor/Game as C
1. Ruffin • NE 6.64
2. Clarke • TOT 5.76
3. Louden • NYC 5.34
4. Gibson • HG 5.06
5. Cash • PS 4.79
Fielding % as C
1. Gibson • HG .984
2. Ruffin • NE .984
3. Louden • NYC .981
4. Cash • PS .976
5. Clarke • TOT .960
Range Factor/9Inn as 1B
1. Clayton • NBY 12.06
2. Pearson • NE 11.19
3. West • PS 10.88
4. Leonard • HG 10.79
5. Thomas • NYC 10.09
Range Factor/Game as 1B
1. Clayton • NBY 11.17
2. Pearson • NE 10.53
3. West • PS 10.27
4. Leonard • HG 10.04
5. Thomas • NYC 9.55
Fielding % as 1B
1. Thomas • NYC .989
2. Pearson • NE .985
3. Leonard • HG .982
4. West • PS .975
5. Barbee • BEG .970
Range Factor/9Inn as 2B
1. Ford • TOT 5.78
2. Easterling • HG 5.56
3. Pérez • NYC 5.34
4. Russell • BEG 5.33
5. Spencer • TOT 5.32
Range Factor/Game as 2B
1. Ford • TOT 5.38
2. Pérez • NYC 4.88
3. Russell • BEG 4.87
4. Easterling • HG 4.69
5. Spencer • TOT 4.59
Fielding % as 2B
1. Easterling • HG .974
2. Russell • BEG .936
Range Factor/9Inn as 3B
1. Watkins • NE 3.76
2. Spearman • PS 3.43
3. Cox • NYC 3.09
4. Wilson • HG 3.07
Range Factor/Game as 3B
1. Watkins • NE 3.54
2. Spearman • PS 3.32
3. Cox • NYC 2.83
4. Wilson • HG 2.72
Fielding % as 3B
1. Cox • NYC .953
2. Spearman • PS .934
3. Wilson • HG .913
4. Watkins • NE .908
Range Factor/9Inn as SS
1. Bankhead • HG 6.16
2. Snow • TOT 6.15
3. Martínez • NYC 5.99
4. Baker • NBY 4.99
Range Factor/Game as SS
1. Bankhead • HG 5.76
2. Snow • TOT 5.62
3. Martínez • NYC 5.50
4. Baker • NBY 4.59
Fielding % as SS
1. Bankhead • HG .978
2. Martínez • NYC .965
3. Baker • NBY .905
Range Factor/9Inn as LF (s.1948)
1. Hoskins • BEG 2.25
2. Parnell • PS 1.73
3. Bell • HG 1.60
Range Factor/Game as LF (s.1901)
1. Hoskins • BEG 2.09
2. Parnell • PS 1.54
3. Bell • HG 1.47
Fielding % as LF (s.1901)
1. Bell • HG .988
2. Hoskins • BEG .973
3. Parnell • PS .871
Range Factor/9Inn as CF (s.1948)
1. Benson • PS 2.75
2. Kimbro • BEG 2.54
3. Benjamin • HG 2.49
4. Vargas • NYC 2.20
5. Davis • NE 1.77
Range Factor/Game as CF (s.1901)
1. Benson • PS 2.64
2. Kimbro • BEG 2.38
3. Benjamin • HG 2.30
4. Vargas • NYC 2.00
5. Davis • NE 1.64
Fielding % as CF (s.1901)
1. Benjamin • HG .987
2. Vargas • NYC .984
3. Kimbro • BEG .964
4. Benson • PS .959
Range Factor/9Inn as RF (s.1948)
1. Curry • PS 1.61
2. Coimbre • NYC 1.52
3. Harris • HG 1.51
4. Brown • HG 1.08
Range Factor/Game as RF (s.1901)
1. Curry • PS 1.46
2. Coimbre • NYC 1.40
3. Harris • HG 1.33
4. Brown • HG 0.87
Fielding % as RF (s.1901)
1. Curry • PS .962
2. Harris • HG .930
3. Coimbre • NYC .925
Range Factor/9Inn as P
1. Curry • PS 3.46
2. Byrd • TOT 3.33
3. Day • NE 3.25
4. Walker • HG 3.17
5. Glover • BEG 3.13
Range Factor/Game as P
1. Byrd • TOT 2.63
2. Curry • PS 2.29
3. Harvey • BEG 2.23
4. Barnhill • NYC 2.18
5. Walker • HG 1.90
Fielding % as P
1. Hooker • TOT 1.000
Brown • HG 1.000
Carter • HG 1.000
Curry • PS 1.000
Howard • NYC 1.000
Stanley • NBY 1.000

A ** by the stat's value indicates the player had fewer than the required number of at bats or plate appearances for the BA, OBP, SLG or OPS title that year. In order to rank the player, the necessary number of hitless at bats were added to the player's season total. The value printed here is their actual value and not the value used to rank them, therefore some numbers may appear out of order.

For batting rate stats, generally a minimum of 3.1 Plate Appearances/G, 1.0 IP/G, 0.67 Gm and Chances/Team Game (fielding), 0.2 SB att/Team Game (catchers), and 0.1 SB att/Team Game (baserunners only since 1951), and 0.1 decision/G for single-season leaderboards generally needed for rate statistics. For pitcher fielding the minimums are reduced by a third. For LF, CF, RF fielding stats, we only have reliable data since 1901, so all leaders are since 1901. Explanation of min. requirements

More 1943 Negro National League II Pages

1943 NN2 Season

Minor Leagues

Standings

Fielding

Batting

Pitching

Managers

Fielding

Batting

Pitching

Leaders & Awards

Other