Rankings of Negro League players should consider that Negro League data is not complete. Research is still ongoing and we’ll continue to publish updates as more information becomes available. Negro Leagues Data: Frequently Asked Questions (NEW)
Negro National League II Pitching Leaders
1. | Gibson • HG | 6.3 |
2. | Wright • HG | 5.5 |
3. | Byrd • 2TM | 4.9 |
4. | Barnhill • NYC | 4.7 |
5. | Benjamin • HG | 2.6 |
6. | Walker • HG | 2.4 |
7. | Leonard • HG | 2.3 |
8. | Easterling • HG | 2.2 |
9. | Brown • PS | 2.1 |
10. | Carter • HG | 2.0 |
1. | Wright • HG | 5.7 |
2. | Byrd • 2TM | 4.9 |
3. | Barnhill • NYC | 4.1 |
4. | Carter • HG | 2.0 |
5. | Walker • HG | 1.9 |
6. | Anderson • 2TM | 1.4 |
7. | Hooker • 2TM | 1.2 |
8. | Brown • HG | 1.0 |
9. | Walker • HAR | 1.0 |
10. | Brown • PS | 1.0 |
1. | Wright • HG | 2.54 |
2. | Barnhill • NYC | 2.83 |
3. | Byrd • 2TM | 2.93 |
4. | Walker • HG | 3.36 |
5. | Boone • HAR | 3.57 |
6. | Carter • HG | 3.83 |
7. | Anderson • 2TM | 4.01 |
8. | Brown • HG | 4.10 |
9. | Hooker • 2TM | 4.36 |
10. | Day • 2TM | 4.44 |
1. | Wright • HG | 18 |
2. | Carter • HG | 14 |
3. | Barnhill • NYC | 11 |
4. | Byrd • 2TM | 10 |
5. | Walker • HG | 9 |
6. | Hooker • 2TM | 7 |
Anderson • 2TM | 7 | |
8. | Brown • HG | 6 |
Buchanan • PS | 6 | |
10. | Brown • PS | 5 |
1. | Carter • HG | .875 |
2. | Brown • HG | .857 |
Wright • HG | .857 | |
4. | Anderson • 2TM | .778 |
5. | Barnhill • NYC | .733 |
6. | Walker • HG | .692 |
7. | Day • 2TM | .667 |
Byrd • 2TM | .667 | |
Partlow • HG | .667 | |
10. | Hooker • 2TM | .636 |
1. | Barnhill • NYC | 1.092 |
2. | Wright • HG | 1.110 |
3. | Boone • HAR | 1.213 |
4. | Byrd • 2TM | 1.259 |
5. | Walker • HG | 1.278 |
6. | Day • 2TM | 1.329 |
7. | Stanley • NBY | 1.329 |
8. | Brown • HG | 1.339 |
9. | Carter • HG | 1.350 |
10. | Anderson • 2TM | 1.430 |
1. | Boone • HAR | 6.353 |
2. | Barnhill • NYC | 7.209 |
3. | Walker • HG | 7.269 |
4. | Wright • HG | 8.006 |
5. | Day • 2TM | 8.544 |
6. | Byrd • 2TM | 8.933 |
7. | Brown • HG | 9.040 |
8. | Howard • NYC | 9.269 |
9. | Anderson • 2TM | 9.281 |
10. | Stanley • NBY | 9.377 |
1. | Wright • HG | 1.989 |
2. | Byrd • 2TM | 2.400 |
3. | Carter • HG | 2.475 |
4. | Stanley • NBY | 2.587 |
5. | Barnhill • NYC | 2.615 |
6. | Griffith • NBY | 2.859 |
7. | Harvey • BEG | 2.879 |
8. | Brown • HG | 3.013 |
9. | Hooker • 2TM | 3.189 |
10. | Buchanan • PS | 3.191 |
1. | Boone • HAR | 10.125 |
2. | Day • 2TM | 6.665 |
3. | Byrd • 2TM | 6.267 |
4. | Glover • BEG | 6.255 |
5. | Barnhill • NYC | 6.149 |
6. | Hill • NE | 5.676 |
7. | Stanley • NBY | 5.174 |
8. | Howard • NYC | 5.037 |
9. | Porter • BEG | 5.014 |
10. | Wright • HG | 4.674 |
1. | Wright • HG | 30 |
2. | Walker • HG | 21 |
Carter • HG | 21 | |
4. | Glover • BEG | 19 |
Byrd • 2TM | 19 | |
6. | Hooker • 2TM | 17 |
Barnhill • NYC | 17 | |
Brown • PS | 17 | |
9. | Evans • 2TM | 15 |
10. | Brown • HG | 14 |
1. | Walker • HG | 2 |
2. | Brown • HG | 1 |
Crue • NYC | 1 | |
Glover • BEG | 1 | |
Howard • NYC | 1 | |
Partlow • HG | 1 | |
Stevenson • HG | 1 | |
Williams • NE | 1 | |
Wright • HG | 1 |
1. | Wright • HG | 181.0 |
2. | Byrd • 2TM | 135.0 |
3. | Brown • PS | 129.1 |
4. | Barnhill • NYC | 127.1 |
5. | Carter • HG | 120.0 |
6. | Walker • HG | 112.2 |
7. | Harvey • BEG | 90.2 |
8. | Glover • BEG | 86.1 |
9. | Anderson • 2TM | 85.1 |
10. | Hooker • 2TM | 84.2 |
1. | Wright • HG | 94 |
Byrd • 2TM | 94 | |
3. | Barnhill • NYC | 87 |
4. | Glover • BEG | 60 |
5. | Walker • HG | 51 |
Boone • HAR | 51 | |
7. | Brown • PS | 50 |
8. | Carter • HG | 44 |
9. | Hooker • 2TM | 43 |
10. | Day • 2TM | 39 |
1. | Wright • HG | 22 |
2. | Barnhill • NYC | 15 |
Brown • PS | 15 | |
4. | Byrd • 2TM | 13 |
Harvey • BEG | 13 | |
6. | Walker • HG | 12 |
Carter • HG | 12 | |
8. | Glover • BEG | 11 |
9. | Anderson • 2TM | 10 |
10. | Brown • HG | 9 |
Buchanan • PS | 9 |
1. | Wright • HG | 15 |
2. | Byrd • 2TM | 12 |
3. | Barnhill • NYC | 11 |
Brown • PS | 11 | |
5. | Harvey • BEG | 10 |
6. | Walker • HG | 9 |
7. | Carter • HG | 8 |
8. | Anderson • 2TM | 7 |
9. | Brown • HG | 6 |
10. | Buchanan • PS | 5 |
1. | Barnhill • NYC | 4 |
2. | Wright • HG | 3 |
3. | Brown • HG | 2 |
Byrd • 2TM | 2 | |
5. | Carter • HG | 1 |
Coimbre • NYC | 1 | |
Curry • PS | 1 | |
Griffith • NBY | 1 | |
Harvey • BEG | 1 | |
McAllister • HAR | 1 | |
Walker • HAR | 1 | |
Anderson • 2TM | 1 | |
Hooker • 2TM | 1 |
1. | Brown • PS | 8 |
2. | Hooker • 2TM | 4 |
Stanley • NBY | 4 | |
Harvey • BEG | 4 | |
Forrest • NBY | 4 | |
Carter • HG | 4 | |
7. | Barnhill • NYC | 3 |
8. | Byrd • 2TM | 2 |
Walker • HG | 2 | |
Porter • BEG | 2 | |
Partlow • HG | 2 | |
West • HG | 2 | |
McCrary • NBY | 2 | |
McAllister • HAR | 2 | |
Williams • NE | 2 | |
Hobgood • NE | 2 | |
Hill • NE | 2 | |
Griffith • NBY | 2 | |
Glover • BEG | 2 | |
Adams • 2TM | 2 | |
Crue • NYC | 2 |
1. | Walker • HG | 53 |
2. | Brown • PS | 52 |
3. | Hill • NE | 45 |
4. | Wright • HG | 40 |
5. | Barnhill • NYC | 37 |
6. | Byrd • 2TM | 36 |
7. | Evans • 2TM | 35 |
8. | Anderson • 2TM | 34 |
9. | Carter • HG | 33 |
10. | Glover • BEG | 31 |
1. | Wright • HG | 161 |
2. | Brown • PS | 146 |
3. | Byrd • 2TM | 134 |
4. | Carter • HG | 129 |
5. | Glover • BEG | 110 |
6. | Harvey • BEG | 107 |
7. | Barnhill • NYC | 102 |
8. | Hooker • 2TM | 92 |
9. | Walker • HG | 91 |
10. | Anderson • 2TM | 88 |
1. | Byrd • 2TM | 2.611 |
2. | Barnhill • NYC | 2.351 |
3. | Wright • HG | 2.350 |
4. | Boone • HAR | 2.217 |
5. | Stanley • NBY | 2.000 |
6. | Day • 2TM | 1.950 |
7. | Glover • BEG | 1.935 |
8. | Hooker • 2TM | 1.433 |
9. | Porter • BEG | 1.368 |
10. | Carter • HG | 1.333 |
1. | Curry • PS | 0.000 |
2. | Wright • HG | 0.050 |
3. | Anderson • 2TM | 0.105 |
4. | Brown • HG | 0.121 |
5. | Buchanan • PS | 0.123 |
6. | Byrd • 2TM | 0.133 |
7. | Evans • 2TM | 0.139 |
8. | Walker • HG | 0.160 |
9. | Day • 2TM | 0.171 |
10. | Boone • HAR | 0.199 |
1. | Harvey • BEG | 11 |
2. | Brown • PS | 8 |
3. | Forrest • NBY | 6 |
4. | Hill • NE | 5 |
Byrd • 2TM | 5 | |
Adams • 2TM | 5 | |
Glover • BEG | 5 | |
Stanley • NBY | 5 | |
9. | Barnhill • NYC | 4 |
Hobgood • NE | 4 | |
Griffith • NBY | 4 | |
Walker • HG | 4 | |
Buchanan • PS | 4 | |
Evans • 2TM | 4 | |
Hooker • 2TM | 4 |
1. | Brown • PS | 67 |
2. | Adams • 2TM | 53 |
3. | Wright • HG | 51 |
Carter • HG | 51 | |
5. | Glover • BEG | 48 |
6. | Harvey • BEG | 47 |
7. | Evans • 2TM | 46 |
8. | Byrd • 2TM | 44 |
9. | Walker • HG | 42 |
Buchanan • PS | 42 |
1. | Boone • HAR | 5 |
2. | Glover • BEG | 4 |
3. | Brown • PS | 3 |
Walker • HG | 3 | |
5. | Hill • NE | 2 |
Harvey • BEG | 2 | |
Griffith • NBY | 2 | |
Elam • NE | 2 | |
9. | Adams • 2TM | 1 |
Wright • HG | 1 | |
Walker • HAR | 1 | |
McAllister • HAR | 1 | |
Kimbrough • PS | 1 | |
Jones • HG | 1 | |
Hobgood • NE | 1 | |
Fernández • NYC | 1 | |
Forrest • NBY | 1 |
1. | Byrd • 2TM | 3 |
Wright • HG | 3 | |
Burns • BEG | 3 | |
Glover • BEG | 3 | |
Harvey • BEG | 3 | |
6. | Boone • HAR | 2 |
Anderson • 2TM | 2 | |
Walker • HAR | 2 | |
Porter • BEG | 2 | |
McAllister • HAR | 2 | |
Hill • NE | 2 | |
Brown • HG | 2 |
1. | Wright • HG | 745 |
2. | Brown • PS | 591 |
3. | Byrd • 2TM | 563 |
4. | Barnhill • NYC | 518 |
5. | Carter • HG | 504 |
6. | Walker • HG | 485 |
7. | Harvey • BEG | 412 |
8. | Glover • BEG | 401 |
9. | Hooker • 2TM | 388 |
10. | Anderson • 2TM | 383 |
1. | Wright • HG | 191 |
2. | Barnhill • NYC | 171 |
3. | Byrd • 2TM | 166 |
4. | Walker • HG | 144 |
5. | Boone • HAR | 136 |
6. | Carter • HG | 127 |
7. | Anderson • 2TM | 121 |
8. | Brown • HG | 118 |
9. | Hooker • 2TM | 112 |
10. | Day • 2TM | 110 |
1. | Byrd • 2TM | 2.32 |
2. | Boone • HAR | 2.35 |
3. | Wright • HG | 2.40 |
4. | Barnhill • NYC | 2.49 |
5. | Day • 2TM | 2.56 |
6. | Glover • BEG | 2.75 |
7. | Curry • PS | 2.87 |
8. | Brown • HG | 3.14 |
9. | Carter • HG | 3.20 |
10. | Hooker • 2TM | 3.32 |
We're Social...for Statheads
Every Sports Reference Social Media Account
Site Last Updated: Tuesday, January 21, 11:26PM
Question, Comment, Feedback, or Correction?
Subscribe to our Free Email Newsletter
Subscribe to Stathead Baseball: Get your first month FREE
Your All-Access Ticket to the Baseball Reference Database
Do you have a sports website? Or write about sports? We have tools and resources that can help you use sports data. Find out more.