Highest HR rate
Posted by Andy on August 18, 2007
For players with fewer than 200 career hits, here are the leaders among home runs:
Cnt Player HR H From To +----+-----------------+---+----+----+----+ 1 Bobby Estalella 48 195 1996 2004 2 Chris Duncan 43 172 2005 2007 3 Frank Fernandez 39 145 1967 1972 4 Jack Graham 38 179 1946 1949 5 Dave Hostetler 37 187 1981 1988 6 Mike Simms 36 163 1990 1999 7 Earl Wilson 35 144 1959 1970 8 Bob Thurman 35 163 1955 1959 9 Ken Hunt 33 177 1959 1964 10 Brian Buchanan 32 198 2000 2004
This list was created with a summed Batting Season Finder with the restriction of not more than 200 total hits.
Doing a little extra math on my own, we can re-order this list by percentage of those hits that were homers:
88 Kevin Roberson 20 61 1993 1996 32.8% 79 Jack Harshman 21 76 1948 1960 27.6% 3 Frank Fernandez 39 145 1967 1972 26.9% 2 Chris Duncan 43 172 2005 2007 25.0% 141 Jim Baxes 17 69 1959 1959 24.6% 1 Bobby Estalella 48 195 1996 2004 24.6% 57 J.R. Phillips 23 94 1993 1999 24.5% 7 Earl Wilson 35 144 1959 1970 24.3% 35 Jack Cust 25 104 2001 2007 24.0% 167 Josh Hamilton 15 63 2007 2007 23.8%
Wow, this is an interesting list. Duncan, Cust, and Hamilton are the active players on here, and are probably likely to have their HR rates drop off. Hamilton's got an interesting backstory, overcoming drug addiction to make it to the majors. Cust was a highly-regarded power hitter in the minors who has bounced around a lot (5 teams in 6 major league seasons!) but perhaps will stick with Oakland. Chris Duncan might be the most impressive guy on this list because he's close to 200 hits already but has maintained such a high home-run rate of exactly 25%. (Incidentally, Chris' brother Shelley Duncan has 6 HR in 13 career hits so far, a ridiculous rate of 46%, and for the sake of completeness, their dad Dave Duncan had 109 HR in 617 career hits, 17.7%)
Does anybody out there know the story of Jim Baxes? He had one very productive season and then never played again. All I could see was that he passed away in 1996.
Here are the leaders for players with between 201 and 500 hits in their career:
Cnt Player HR H From To Ages +----+-----------------+---+----+----+----+-----+ 1 Ken Phelps 123 443 1980 1990 25-35 2 Russell Branyan 119 420 1998 2007 22-31 3 Ryan Howard 115 381 2004 2007 24-27 4 Luke Easter 93 472 1949 1954 33-38 5 Phil Plantier 91 457 1990 1997 21-28 6 Shane Andrews 86 375 1995 2002 23-30 7 Willie Greene 86 446 1992 2000 20-28 8 Pat Seerey 86 406 1943 1949 20-26 9 Adam LaRoche 83 454 2004 2007 24-27 10 Bubba Trammell 82 469 1997 2003 25-31 11 Roger Repoz 82 480 1964 1972 23-31
And again with some math added in, here are the leaders from the 201-500 hit group by HR percentage:
3 Ryan Howard 115 381 2004 2007 24-27 30.2% 2 Russell Branyan 119 420 1998 2007 22-31 28.3% 1 Ken Phelps 123 443 1980 1990 25-35 27.8% 68 Marcus Thames 58 218 2002 2007 25-30 26.6% 80 Dave Ross 55 211 2002 2007 25-30 26.1% 49 Sam Horn 62 250 1987 1995 23-31 24.8% 32 Johnny Blanchard 67 285 1955 1965 22-32 23.5% 6 Shane Andrews 86 375 1995 2002 23-30 22.9% 38 Kevin Maas 65 287 1990 1995 25-30 22.6% 27 Prince Fielder 67 297 2005 2007 21-23 22.6%
Interesting that this list (as compared to the one for <200 hits) is much more focused on more recent players. That's due to the regression to the mean. The more hits a player has, the harder it is to maintain a HR rate higher than league average, so the closer the rates tend to regress to the league average for the era they played in. Since HR rates are much higher in the 1990s-present than earlier in baseball, it's not surprising that players from the current era are represented more.
This list is also pretty neat. The Phillies currently have #1 (Howard) and #2 (Branyan) on this list. Yankee fans in their 30s or later will remember Ken Phelps and Kevin Maas. Interesting to see two current journeymen, Thames and Ross, here. Sam Horn is so famous he has a website named after him (well--him plus a famous serial killer...) I wonder about Prince Fielder. He's got amazing talent, but he also seems possible that he might have a temper issue. So far he reminds me of Joey Belle (not yet of Albert Belle.)
Here are the leaders for career hits 501 to 1000:
Cnt Player HR H From To Ages +----+-----------------+---+----+----+----+-----+ 1 Adam Dunn 230 803 2001 2007 21-27 2 Rob Deer 230 853 1984 1996 23-35 3 Pat Burrell 205 997 2000 2007 23-30 4 Todd Hundley 202 883 1990 2003 21-34 5 Glenn Davis 190 965 1984 1993 23-32 6 Steve Balboni 181 714 1981 1993 24-36 7 Woodie Held 179 963 1954 1969 22-37 8 Jim Gentile 179 759 1957 1966 23-32 9 Ron Kittle 176 648 1982 1991 24-33 10 Nate Colbert 173 833 1966 1976 20-30
And again by percentage:
1 Adam Dunn 230 803 2001 2007 21-27 28.6% 9 Ron Kittle 176 648 1982 1991 24-33 27.2% 2 Rob Deer 230 853 1984 1996 23-35 27.0% 6 Steve Balboni 181 714 1981 1993 24-36 25.4% 8 Jim Gentile 179 759 1957 1966 23-32 23.6% 31 Bo Jackson 141 598 1986 1994 23-31 23.6% 4 Todd Hundley 202 883 1990 2003 21-34 22.9% 85 Carlos Pena 112 502 2001 2007 23-29 22.3% 34 Travis Hafner 136 628 2002 2007 25-30 21.7% 10 Nate Colbert 173 833 1966 1976 20-30 20.8%
By the way, Teixeira missed this list by 6 thousandths of a percentage point (20.768% for Colbert and 20.762% for Teixeira.)
Rob Deer is the guy we all think of for lists like this. Nice to see him where he belongs. Carlos Pena has muscled his way onto this list with his breakout season this year (26 HR in just 92 hits.)
I notice that as the hit threshold has gone up across these lists (from <200 to 201-500 to 501-100), the players who make up the top percentage lists are guys who hit more career homers. In other words, if you look right above at the 501-1000 list, all players except Pena rank in the top 34 for career HR among that group. But if you go back to the 201-500 list, Horn, Thames, Ross, and Maas all rank lower than that. And in the first list (<200), there are several guys in the range 70 to 170.)
Why would this be? I'm guessing that the issue is playing time. To have at least 500 career hits, most players need at least 3-4 seasons. If your HR% is high enough to make it into the top 10 on this list, and you've already played at least 3-4 seasons, you are going to be a pretty significant star, because you've already hit at least 100 career MLB homers. That means you are likely to play more, and if you can maintain close to the same HR rate, you'll also end up ranking high in total homers. Does that make sense? If not, please post your own theory.
If anybody's interested, I can post the leaders for > 1000 hits.