Rankings of Negro League players should consider that Negro League data is not complete. Research is still ongoing and we’ll continue to publish updates as more information becomes available. Negro Leagues Data: Frequently Asked Questions (NEW)
Negro National League II Pitching Leaders
1. | Manning • NE | 3.3 |
2. | Black • BEG | 3.2 |
3. | Byrd • BEG | 3.2 |
4. | Gilliam • BEG | 3.1 |
Austin • PS | 3.1 | |
6. | Lockett • BEG | 3.0 |
7. | Scantlebury • NYC | 2.8 |
8. | Kimbro • BEG | 2.8 |
9. | Ricks • PS | 2.4 |
10. | Easter • HG | 2.3 |
1. | Manning • NE | 3.2 |
2. | Black • BEG | 2.9 |
3. | Byrd • BEG | 2.5 |
4. | Ricks • PS | 2.3 |
5. | Lewis • NE | 2.1 |
6. | Scantlebury • NYC | 1.8 |
7. | Miller • PS | 1.7 |
8. | Barnhill • NYC | 1.6 |
9. | Romby • BEG | 1.6 |
10. | Hooker • NE | 1.5 |
1. | Ricks • PS | 1.56 |
2. | Manning • NE | 1.59 |
3. | Byrd • BEG | 1.75 |
4. | Lewis • NE | 1.86 |
5. | Black • BEG | 1.91 |
6. | Romby • BEG | 2.10 |
7. | Brown • PS | 2.38 |
8. | Parker • HG | 2.78 |
9. | Barnhill • NYC | 2.85 |
10. | Gaines • BEG | 2.92 |
1. | Byrd • BEG | 10 |
2. | Manning • NE | 9 |
3. | Black • BEG | 8 |
4. | Scantlebury • NYC | 7 |
Miller • PS | 7 | |
McHenry • PS | 7 | |
Gaines • BEG | 7 | |
8. | Romby • BEG | 6 |
Ricks • PS | 6 | |
Parker • HG | 6 | |
Fields • HG | 6 | |
Hooker • NE | 6 |
1. | Ricks • PS | 1.000 |
2. | Fields • HG | .857 |
3. | Parker • HG | .750 |
4. | Black • BEG | .727 |
5. | Byrd • BEG | .714 |
6. | Gaines • BEG | .700 |
7. | Manning • NE | .692 |
8. | Romby • BEG | .600 |
9. | Scantlebury • NYC | .583 |
10. | Hooker • NE | .545 |
1. | Byrd • BEG | 1.022 |
2. | Black • BEG | 1.041 |
3. | Hooker • NE | 1.087 |
4. | Manning • NE | 1.112 |
5. | Lewis • NE | 1.112 |
6. | Romby • BEG | 1.167 |
7. | Gaines • BEG | 1.200 |
8. | Parker • HG | 1.211 |
9. | Fields • HG | 1.214 |
10. | Ricks • PS | 1.231 |
1. | Romby • BEG | 6.400 |
2. | Black • BEG | 6.512 |
3. | Lewis • NE | 6.517 |
4. | Parker • HG | 6.659 |
5. | Manning • NE | 6.988 |
6. | Ricks • PS | 7.442 |
7. | Byrd • BEG | 7.589 |
8. | Golden • NE | 7.875 |
9. | Gaines • BEG | 7.992 |
10. | Hooker • NE | 8.151 |
1. | Scantlebury • NYC | 1.543 |
2. | Byrd • BEG | 1.605 |
3. | Hooker • NE | 1.630 |
4. | Burke • BEG | 1.645 |
5. | Fields • HG | 1.929 |
6. | Partlow • PS | 1.938 |
7. | McHenry • PS | 2.414 |
8. | Brown • PS | 2.541 |
9. | Gaines • BEG | 2.808 |
10. | Black • BEG | 2.859 |
1. | Brown • PS | 6.988 |
2. | Romby • BEG | 6.800 |
3. | Black • BEG | 6.750 |
4. | Gaines • BEG | 6.372 |
5. | Manning • NE | 5.797 |
6. | Byrd • BEG | 5.765 |
7. | Lewis • NE | 5.703 |
8. | McHenry • PS | 5.632 |
9. | Thurman • HG | 5.617 |
10. | Miller • PS | 5.481 |
1. | Miller • PS | 18 |
2. | Black • BEG | 17 |
Byrd • BEG | 17 | |
4. | McHenry • PS | 16 |
Romby • BEG | 16 | |
Scantlebury • NYC | 16 | |
7. | Williams • NE | 15 |
Manning • NE | 15 | |
Golden • NE | 15 | |
10. | Hooker • NE | 14 |
1. | Romby • BEG | 3 |
Thompson • HG | 3 | |
3. | Golden • NE | 2 |
4. | Alexander • HG | 1 |
Barnhill • NYC | 1 | |
Black • BEG | 1 | |
Ferrell • BEG | 1 | |
Lewis • NE | 1 | |
Ricks • PS | 1 | |
Stanley • NBY | 1 | |
Trice • HG | 1 | |
Williams • NE | 1 | |
Wilmore • BEG | 1 |
1. | Byrd • BEG | 123.1 |
2. | Scantlebury • NYC | 116.2 |
3. | Black • BEG | 113.1 |
Manning • NE | 113.1 | |
5. | Miller • PS | 111.2 |
6. | McHenry • PS | 100.2 |
7. | Romby • BEG | 90.0 |
8. | Hooker • NE | 88.1 |
9. | Barnhill • NYC | 85.1 |
10. | Gaines • BEG | 83.1 |
1. | Black • BEG | 85 |
2. | Byrd • BEG | 79 |
3. | Manning • NE | 73 |
4. | Miller • PS | 68 |
Romby • BEG | 68 | |
6. | McHenry • PS | 63 |
Scantlebury • NYC | 63 | |
8. | Gaines • BEG | 59 |
9. | Barnhill • NYC | 50 |
10. | Lewis • NE | 49 |
1. | Manning • NE | 14 |
Miller • PS | 14 | |
3. | Scantlebury • NYC | 13 |
4. | Barnhill • NYC | 12 |
Black • BEG | 12 | |
McHenry • PS | 12 | |
Byrd • BEG | 12 | |
8. | Hooker • NE | 11 |
Gaines • BEG | 11 | |
10. | Romby • BEG | 10 |
1. | Manning • NE | 12 |
2. | Byrd • BEG | 11 |
3. | McHenry • PS | 10 |
4. | Scantlebury • NYC | 9 |
5. | Barnhill • NYC | 8 |
Black • BEG | 8 | |
Hooker • NE | 8 | |
8. | Romby • BEG | 7 |
Miller • PS | 7 | |
10. | Parker • HG | 6 |
Thurman • HG | 6 | |
Gaines • BEG | 6 |
1. | Lewis • NE | 3 |
2. | Black • BEG | 2 |
Golden • NE | 2 | |
4. | Barnhill • NYC | 1 |
Burke • BEG | 1 | |
Fields • HG | 1 | |
Griffith • NBY | 1 | |
Manning • NE | 1 | |
McHenry • PS | 1 | |
Miller • PS | 1 | |
Ricks • PS | 1 | |
Romby • BEG | 1 | |
Scantlebury • NYC | 1 | |
Thurman • HG | 1 |
1. | Barnhill • NYC | 7 |
2. | Scantlebury • NYC | 6 |
Miller • PS | 6 | |
4. | McHenry • PS | 5 |
5. | Smith • NBY | 3 |
Parker • HG | 3 | |
López • NYC | 3 | |
Griffith • NBY | 3 | |
Golden • NE | 3 | |
Davidson • NBY | 3 | |
Brown • PS | 3 | |
Black • BEG | 3 |
1. | Miller • PS | 51 |
2. | Romby • BEG | 41 |
3. | Manning • NE | 38 |
4. | Black • BEG | 36 |
5. | Parker • HG | 35 |
6. | López • NYC | 32 |
7. | Golden • NE | 31 |
8. | Barnhill • NYC | 30 |
Lewis • NE | 30 | |
10. | Williams • NE | 29 |
1. | Scantlebury • NYC | 126 |
2. | McHenry • PS | 116 |
3. | Miller • PS | 108 |
4. | Byrd • BEG | 104 |
5. | Manning • NE | 88 |
6. | Barnhill • NYC | 87 |
7. | Williams • NE | 84 |
8. | Black • BEG | 82 |
9. | Hooker • NE | 80 |
10. | Burke • BEG | 78 |
1. | Byrd • BEG | 3.591 |
2. | Scantlebury • NYC | 3.150 |
3. | Brown • PS | 2.750 |
4. | Hooker • NE | 2.563 |
5. | Black • BEG | 2.361 |
6. | Partlow • PS | 2.357 |
7. | McHenry • PS | 2.333 |
8. | Gaines • BEG | 2.269 |
9. | Fields • HG | 2.167 |
10. | Manning • NE | 1.921 |
1. | Burke • BEG | 0.000 |
Ricks • PS | 0.000 | |
Manning • NE | 0.000 | |
4. | Romby • BEG | 0.100 |
5. | Gaines • BEG | 0.108 |
6. | Lewis • NE | 0.116 |
7. | Williams • NE | 0.125 |
8. | Byrd • BEG | 0.146 |
9. | Thurman • HG | 0.181 |
10. | Hooker • NE | 0.204 |
1. | Barnhill • NYC | 7 |
Williams • NE | 7 | |
3. | Miller • PS | 6 |
McHenry • PS | 6 | |
Lewis • NE | 6 | |
6. | Hooker • NE | 5 |
Brown • PS | 5 | |
Scantlebury • NYC | 5 | |
López • NYC | 5 | |
10. | Manning • NE | 4 |
Golden • NE | 4 | |
Stephens • NBY | 4 | |
Thompson • HG | 4 | |
Thurman • HG | 4 | |
Byrd • BEG | 4 | |
Romby • BEG | 4 |
1. | Miller • PS | 49 |
2. | McHenry • PS | 44 |
3. | Scantlebury • NYC | 39 |
4. | Williams • NE | 36 |
5. | Hooker • NE | 31 |
6. | Golden • NE | 28 |
Thurman • HG | 28 | |
López • NYC | 28 | |
9. | Gaines • BEG | 27 |
Barnhill • NYC | 27 |
1. | Barnhill • NYC | 4 |
2. | Brown • PS | 2 |
Burke • BEG | 2 | |
Evans • HG | 2 | |
Williams • NE | 2 | |
Lewis • NE | 2 | |
Scantlebury • NYC | 2 | |
Manning • NE | 2 | |
McHenry • PS | 2 | |
Miller • PS | 2 | |
Ricks • PS | 2 |
1. | Williams • NE | 4 |
2. | López • NYC | 3 |
Stanley • NBY | 3 | |
Smith • NBY | 3 | |
Hooker • NE | 3 | |
6. | Davidson • NBY | 2 |
Thompson • HG | 2 | |
Stephens • NBY | 2 | |
Burke • BEG | 2 | |
Romby • BEG | 2 | |
Ricks • PS | 2 | |
Partlow • PS | 2 | |
Miller • PS | 2 | |
McHenry • PS | 2 | |
Manning • NE | 2 | |
Jenkins • NYC | 2 | |
Evans • HG | 2 | |
Lewis • NE | 2 |
1. | Scantlebury • NYC | 492 |
2. | Byrd • BEG | 487 |
3. | Miller • PS | 484 |
4. | Manning • NE | 468 |
5. | Black • BEG | 446 |
6. | McHenry • PS | 436 |
7. | Barnhill • NYC | 374 |
8. | Romby • BEG | 365 |
9. | Hooker • NE | 364 |
10. | Gaines • BEG | 347 |
1. | Williams • NE | 6 |
Golden • NE | 6 | |
Romby • BEG | 6 | |
4. | Jenkins • NYC | 5 |
López • NYC | 5 | |
Byrd • BEG | 5 | |
Brown • PS | 5 | |
8. | Black • BEG | 4 |
Miller • PS | 4 | |
Bell • HG | 4 | |
Griffith • NBY | 4 |
1. | Ricks • PS | 219 |
2. | Manning • NE | 214 |
3. | Byrd • BEG | 194 |
4. | Lewis • NE | 183 |
5. | Black • BEG | 179 |
6. | Romby • BEG | 162 |
7. | Brown • PS | 143 |
8. | Parker • HG | 122 |
9. | Barnhill • NYC | 120 |
10. | Gaines • BEG | 117 |
1. | Byrd • BEG | 2.25 |
2. | Gaines • BEG | 2.47 |
3. | Manning • NE | 2.53 |
4. | Black • BEG | 2.58 |
5. | Hooker • NE | 2.77 |
6. | Burke • BEG | 2.79 |
7. | Brown • PS | 2.79 |
8. | Romby • BEG | 2.82 |
9. | Scantlebury • NYC | 2.86 |
10. | Partlow • PS | 2.88 |
We're Social...for Statheads
Every Sports Reference Social Media Account
Site Last Updated: Monday, November 11, 10:22PM
Question, Comment, Feedback, or Correction?
Subscribe to our Free Email Newsletter
Subscribe to Stathead Baseball: Get your first month FREE
Your All-Access Ticket to the Baseball Reference Database
Do you have a sports website? Or write about sports? We have tools and resources that can help you use sports data. Find out more.