1924 Eastern Colored League Batting Leaders

Other Leagues: Major Leagues, AL, NL, NNL

Pennant Winner: Hilldale Club

Become a Stathead & surf this site ad-free.

Rankings of Negro League players should consider that Negro League data is not complete. Research is still ongoing and we’ll continue to publish updates as more information becomes available. More about data coverage

Eastern Colored League Batting Leaders

Wins Above Replacement--all
1.	Winters • HIL	7.5
2.	Brown • NLG	6.4
3.	Ryan • HIL	4.8
4.	Charleston • HBG	4.3
5.	Henderson • AC	2.8
6.	Lundy • AC	2.7
7.	Johnson • HIL	2.7
8.	Flournoy • BRG	2.6
9.	McClure • BBS	2.5
10.	Levis • CSE	2.3

WAR Position Players
1.	Charleston • HBG	4.3
2.	Lundy • AC	2.7
3.	Johnson • HIL	2.7
4.	Lloyd • AC	2.2
5.	Scales • NLG	2.2
6.	Mackey • HIL	2.1
7.	Beckwith • BBS	2.0
	Williams • NLG	2.0
9.	Wilson • BBS	2.0
10.	Hudspeth • NLG	1.8

Offensive WAR
1.	Charleston • HBG	4.3
2.	Lundy • AC	2.6
3.	Johnson • HIL	2.6
4.	Lloyd • AC	2.2
5.	Scales • NLG	2.1
6.	Mackey • HIL	2.0
7.	Beckwith • BBS	2.0
8.	Wilson • BBS	2.0
	Williams • NLG	2.0
10.	Hudspeth • NLG	1.8

Defensive WAR
1.	Lundy • AC	0.4
2.	Williams • NLG	0.4
3.	Fiall • HBG	0.2
	Johnson • HIL	0.2
5.	Hamilton • WP	0.2
	Warfield • HIL	0.2
7.	Chacón • CSE	0.2
	Beckwith • BBS	0.2
9.	Turner • BRG	0.2
10.	Lloyd • AC	0.2

Batting Average
1.	Charleston • HBG	.405
2.	Wilson • BBS	.385
3.	Lloyd • AC	.366
4.	Santop • HIL	.354
5.	Scales • NLG	.341
6.	Jenkins • HBG	.336
7.	Hudspeth • NLG	.336
8.	Johnson • HIL	.336
9.	Mason • 2TM	.332
10.	Mackey • HIL	.330

On-Base%
1.	Charleston • HBG	.476
2.	Wilson • BBS	.431
3.	Scales • NLG	.422
4.	Jenkins • HBG	.418
5.	Lloyd • AC	.415
6.	Santop • HIL	.385
7.	Lundy • AC	.385
8.	Hudspeth • NLG	.385
9.	Johnson • HIL	.384
10.	Marcell • NLG	.380

Slugging %
1.	Charleston • HBG	.780
2.	Mason • 2TM	.540
3.	Santop • HIL	.517
4.	Johnson • HIL	.504
5.	Wilson • BBS	.503
6.	Hudspeth • NLG	.498
7.	Lundy • AC	.492
8.	Thomas • HIL	.489
9.	Scales • NLG	.476
10.	Mackey • HIL	.465

On-Base Plus Slugging
1.	Charleston • HBG	1.257
2.	Wilson • BBS	.934
3.	Mason • 2TM	.914
4.	Santop • HIL	.902
5.	Scales • NLG	.897
6.	Johnson • HIL	.888
7.	Hudspeth • NLG	.882
8.	Lloyd • AC	.877
9.	Lundy • AC	.877
10.	Mackey • HIL	.828

Games Played
1.	Johnson • HIL	68
	Mackey • HIL	68
	Thomas • HIL	68
	Warfield • HIL	68
5.	Reid • AC	65
6.	Cummings • AC	63
	Lundy • AC	63
8.	Johnson • HIL	62
9.	Hudspeth • NLG	61
	Williams • NLG	61

At Bats
1.	Mackey • HIL	273
2.	Thomas • HIL	266
3.	Warfield • HIL	265
4.	Johnson • HIL	256
5.	Williams • NLG	251
6.	Lundy • AC	242
7.	Cummings • AC	237
	Reid • AC	237
9.	Shively • 2TM	236
10.	Johnston • BBS	229
	Hudspeth • NLG	229

Plate Appearances
1.	Mackey • HIL	287
2.	Thomas • HIL	284
3.	Warfield • HIL	283
4.	Johnson • HIL	276
5.	Williams • NLG	275
6.	Lundy • AC	265
7.	Cummings • AC	256
	Shively • 2TM	256
9.	Briggs • HIL	254
10.	Reid • AC	248

Runs Scored
1.	Charleston • HBG	63
2.	Jenkins • HBG	58
3.	Lundy • AC	55
4.	Mason • 2TM	52
5.	Holloway • BBS	50
	Johnson • HIL	50
	Mackey • HIL	50
8.	Marcell • NLG	49
9.	Warfield • HIL	48
10.	Thomas • HIL	46
	Williams • NLG	46

Hits
1.	Mackey • HIL	90
2.	Johnson • HIL	86
3.	Charleston • HBG	83
4.	Warfield • HIL	82
5.	Lloyd • AC	79
	Lundy • AC	79
7.	Williams • NLG	78
8.	Thomas • HIL	77
	Hudspeth • NLG	77
10.	Wilson • BBS	75

Total Bases
1.	Charleston • HBG	160
2.	Thomas • HIL	130
3.	Johnson • HIL	129
4.	Mackey • HIL	127
5.	Lundy • AC	119
6.	Hudspeth • NLG	114
	Mason • 2TM	114
8.	Warfield • HIL	104
9.	Williams • NLG	102
10.	Lloyd • AC	100
	Holloway • BBS	100

Doubles
1.	Charleston • HBG	22
2.	Johnson • HIL	21
3.	Mackey • HIL	19
4.	Hudspeth • NLG	18
5.	Williams • NLG	16
6.	Thomas • HIL	15
	Kenyon • NLG	15
8.	Warfield • HIL	14
9.	Carr • HIL	13
	Johnson • HIL	13

Triples
1.	Jackson • HBG	8
2.	Thomas • HIL	7
	Johnston • BBS	7
4.	Johnson • HIL	5
	Thomas • BRG	5
	Charleston • HBG	5
7.	Dihigo • CSE	4
	Carr • HIL	4
	Fabré • CSE	4
	Wesley • HBG	4
	White • 2TM	4
	Lundy • AC	4

Home Runs
1.	Charleston • HBG	15
2.	Mason • 2TM	10
3.	Thomas • HIL	8
	Lundy • AC	8
5.	Beckwith • BBS	7
6.	Hudspeth • NLG	5
	Santop • HIL	5
	Holloway • BBS	5
9.	Dixon • HBG	4
	Johnson • HIL	4
	Hampton • WP	4
	Wilson • BBS	4
	Mackey • HIL	4
	Winters • HIL	4
	Scales • NLG	4

Runs Batted In
1.	Charleston • HBG	63
2.	Wilson • BBS	53
3.	Lundy • AC	52
4.	Mason • 2TM	51
5.	Thomas • HIL	49
6.	Lloyd • AC	47
	Johnson • HIL	47
8.	Holloway • BBS	43
9.	Mackey • HIL	42
10.	Williams • NLG	41

Bases on Balls
1.	Jenkins • HBG	30
	Briggs • HIL	30
3.	Charleston • HBG	28
4.	Ramírez • AC	27
5.	Marcell • NLG	26
	Scales • NLG	26
7.	Williams • NLG	24
8.	Lundy • AC	23
	Johnson • HIL	23
10.	Taylor • WP	21

Stolen Bases
1.	Warfield • HIL	22
2.	Charleston • HBG	20
3.	Cummings • AC	19
4.	Holloway • BBS	18
5.	Thomas • HIL	14
	Williams • NLG	14
7.	Lundy • AC	13
	Carr • HIL	13
	Brown • WP	13
10.	Wilson • NLG	12

Singles
1.	Warfield • HIL	65
2.	Mackey • HIL	64
3.	Lloyd • AC	63
	Jenkins • HBG	63
	Shively • 2TM	63
6.	Wilson • BBS	61
7.	Lundy • AC	59
	Williams • NLG	59
9.	Holloway • BBS	58
10.	Cummings • AC	56
	Reid • AC	56
	Johnson • HIL	56

Adjusted OPS+
1.	Charleston • HBG	251
2.	Wilson • BBS	163
3.	Mason • 2TM	156
4.	Scales • NLG	153
5.	Santop • HIL	153
6.	Johnson • HIL	150
7.	Hudspeth • NLG	148
8.	Lloyd • AC	148
9.	Lundy • AC	147
10.	Mackey • HIL	133

Runs Created
1.	Charleston • HBG	76
2.	Johnson • HIL	50
3.	Lundy • AC	46
	Mackey • HIL	46
5.	Hudspeth • NLG	44
6.	Thomas • HIL	43
7.	Wilson • BBS	42
	Mason • 2TM	42
9.	Lloyd • AC	41
10.	Williams • NLG	38

Adj. Batting Runs
1.	Charleston • HBG	41
2.	Johnson • HIL	17
3.	Wilson • BBS	17
4.	Hudspeth • NLG	15
5.	Beckwith • BBS	15
6.	Lundy • AC	15
	Scales • NLG	15
8.	Mason • 2TM	15
9.	Lloyd • AC	14
10.	Santop • HIL	12

Adj. Batting Wins
1.	Charleston • HBG	4.0
2.	Johnson • HIL	1.7
3.	Wilson • BBS	1.7
4.	Hudspeth • NLG	1.5
5.	Lundy • AC	1.5
	Scales • NLG	1.5
	Beckwith • BBS	1.5
8.	Mason • 2TM	1.4
9.	Lloyd • AC	1.4
10.	Santop • HIL	1.2

Extra Base Hits
1.	Charleston • HBG	42
2.	Johnson • HIL	30
	Thomas • HIL	30
4.	Mackey • HIL	26
5.	Hudspeth • NLG	25
6.	Mason • 2TM	21
7.	Lundy • AC	20
8.	Williams • NLG	19
9.	Wesley • HBG	18
	Carr • HIL	18
	Johnson • HIL	18
	Kenyon • NLG	18

Times On Base
1.	Charleston • HBG	111
2.	Johnson • HIL	106
3.	Mackey • HIL	104
4.	Lundy • AC	102
	Jenkins • HBG	102
	Williams • NLG	102
7.	Warfield • HIL	100
8.	Lloyd • AC	97
9.	Briggs • HIL	95
	Thomas • HIL	95
	Hudspeth • NLG	95

Offensive Win %
1.	Charleston • HBG	.919
2.	Wilson • BBS	.798
3.	Santop • HIL	.753
4.	Scales • NLG	.752
5.	Lloyd • AC	.747
6.	Mason • 2TM	.746
7.	Johnson • HIL	.741
8.	Hudspeth • NLG	.736
9.	Lundy • AC	.727
10.	Mackey • HIL	.683

Hit By Pitch
1.	Marcell • NLG	1

Power-Speed #
1.	Charleston • HBG	17.1
2.	Thomas • HIL	10.2
3.	Lundy • AC	9.9
4.	Beckwith • BBS	7.9
5.	Holloway • BBS	7.8
6.	Johnson • HIL	5.7
7.	Scales • NLG	5.3
	Mackey • HIL	5.3
9.	Mason • 2TM	4.6
10.	Wilson • BBS	4.4
	Hudspeth • NLG	4.4
	Santop • HIL	4.4
	Dixon • HBG	4.4

AB per HR
1.	Charleston • HBG	13.7
2.	Mason • 2TM	21.1
3.	Lundy • AC	30.3
4.	Thomas • HIL	33.3
5.	Santop • HIL	35.6
6.	Dixon • HBG	41.5
7.	Holloway • BBS	45.0
8.	Hudspeth • NLG	45.8
9.	Scales • NLG	46.3
10.	Wilson • BBS	48.8

Outs Made
1.	Thomas • HIL	189
2.	Mackey • HIL	183
	Warfield • HIL	183
4.	Cummings • AC	177
5.	Williams • NLG	173
6.	Reid • AC	170
	Johnson • HIL	170
8.	Shively • 2TM	169
9.	Wilson • NLG	166
10.	Johnston • BBS	165

A ** by the stat's value indicates the player had fewer than the required number of at bats or plate appearances for the BA, OBP, SLG or OPS title that year. In order to rank the player, the necessary number of hitless at bats were added to the player's season total. The value printed here is their actual value and not the value used to rank them, therefore some numbers may appear out of order.

For batting rate stats, generally a minimum of 3.1 Plate Appearances/G, 1.0 IP/G, 0.67 Gm and Chances/Team Game (fielding), 0.2 SB att/Team Game (catchers), and 0.1 SB att/Team Game (baserunners only since 1951), and 0.1 decision/G for single-season leaderboards generally needed for rate statistics. For pitcher fielding the minimums are reduced by a third. For LF, CF, RF fielding stats, we only have reliable data since 1901, so all leaders are since 1901. Explanation of min. requirements