This is our old blog. It hasn't been active since 2011. Please see the link above for our current blog or click the logo above to see all of the great data and content on this site.

Best Age 37+ Seasons By Members Of 2,998 Hit Club

Posted by Steve Lombardi on July 8, 2011

Of all the players with 2,998+ career hits, which players had the best seasons, compared to the others, at age 37 or older?

Here is the list -

Rk Player WAR/pos Year Age Tm Lg G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO HBP SH SF GDP SB CS BA OBP SLG OPS Pos
1 Honus Wagner 8.1 1912 38 PIT NL 145 634 558 91 181 35 20 7 102 59 0 38 6 11 0 0 26 0 .324 .395 .496 .891 *6
2 Honus Wagner 7.2 1911 37 PIT NL 130 558 473 87 158 23 16 9 89 67 0 34 6 12 0 0 20 0 .334 .423 .507 .930 *63/8
3 Hank Aaron 6.6 1971 37 ATL NL 139 573 495 95 162 22 3 47 118 71 21 58 2 0 5 9 1 1 .327 .410 .669 1.079 *39
4 Willie Mays 6.6 1968 37 SFG NL 148 573 498 84 144 20 5 23 79 67 7 81 2 0 6 13 12 6 .289 .372 .488 .860 *8/39
5 Willie Mays 6.5 1971 40 SFG NL 136 537 417 82 113 24 5 18 61 112 11 123 3 1 4 8 23 3 .271 .425 .482 .907 *83
6 Ty Cobb 6.2 1925 38 DET AL 121 490 415 97 157 31 12 12 102 65 0 12 5 5 0 0 13 9 .378 .468 .598 1.066 *8/91
7 Cap Anson 6.1 1890 38 CHC NL 139 623 504 95 157 14 5 7 107 113 0 23 6 0 0 0 29 0 .312 .443 .401 .844 *3/24
8 Tris Speaker 6.0 1925 37 CLE AL 117 518 429 79 167 35 5 12 87 70 0 12 4 15 0 0 5 2 .389 .479 .578 1.057 *8
9 Cap Anson 6.0 1889 37 CHC NL 134 609 518 100 177 32 7 7 117 86 0 19 5 0 0 0 27 0 .342 .440 .471 .911 *3
10 Eddie Collins 5.3 1924 37 CHW AL 151 676 556 108 194 27 7 6 86 89 0 16 3 28 0 0 42 17 .349 .441 .455 .896 *4
11 Tony Gwynn 5.2 1997 37 SDP NL 149 651 592 97 220 49 2 17 119 43 12 28 3 1 12 12 12 5 .372 .409 .547 .957 *9/D
12 Eddie Collins 5.2 1925 38 CHW AL 118 533 425 80 147 26 3 3 80 87 0 8 4 17 0 0 19 6 .346 .461 .442 .904 *4
13 Ty Cobb 5.2 1924 37 DET AL 155 726 625 115 211 38 10 4 79 85 0 18 1 15 0 0 23 14 .338 .418 .450 .867 *8
14 Nap Lajoie 5.1 1913 38 CLE AL 137 525 465 66 156 25 2 1 68 33 0 17 15 12 0 0 17 0 .335 .398 .404 .802 *4
15 Willie Mays 5.0 1970 39 SFG NL 139 566 478 94 139 15 2 28 83 79 3 90 3 0 6 7 5 0 .291 .390 .506 .897 *8/3
16 Tris Speaker 5.0 1926 38 CLE AL 150 661 539 96 164 52 8 7 86 94 0 15 0 28 0 0 6 1 .304 .408 .469 .877 *8
17 Hank Aaron 4.8 1973 39 ATL NL 120 465 392 84 118 12 1 40 96 68 13 51 1 0 4 7 1 1 .301 .402 .643 1.045 *79
18 George Brett 4.6 1990 37 KCR AL 142 607 544 82 179 45 7 14 87 56 14 63 0 0 7 18 9 2 .329 .387 .515 .902 *3D/975
19 Carl Yastrzemski 4.5 1977 37 BOS AL 150 643 558 99 165 27 3 28 102 73 6 40 1 0 11 10 11 1 .296 .372 .505 .877 *7/D39
20 Honus Wagner 4.5 1915 41 PIT NL 156 625 566 68 155 32 17 6 78 39 0 64 4 16 0 0 22 15 .274 .325 .422 .747 *643
21 Roberto Clemente 4.4 1972 37 PIT NL 102 413 378 68 118 19 7 10 60 29 7 49 0 0 6 15 0 0 .312 .356 .479 .835 *9
22 Nap Lajoie 4.4 1912 37 CLE AL 117 500 448 66 165 34 4 0 90 28 0 0 7 17 0 0 18 5 .368 .414 .462 .876 *43
23 Rafael Palmeiro 4.2 2002 37 TEX AL 155 663 546 99 149 34 0 43 105 104 16 94 6 0 7 10 2 0 .273 .391 .571 .962 *3D
24 Cap Anson 4.2 1891 39 CHC NL 136 616 540 81 157 24 8 8 120 75 0 29 1 0 0 0 17 0 .291 .378 .409 .788 *3/2
25 Wade Boggs 4.1 1995 37 NYY AL 126 541 460 76 149 22 4 5 63 74 5 50 0 0 7 13 1 1 .324 .412 .422 .834 *5/3
26 Ty Cobb 4.0 1927 40 PHA AL 133 574 490 104 175 32 7 5 93 67 0 12 5 12 0 0 22 16 .357 .440 .482 .921 *98
27 Eddie Collins 3.8 1926 39 CHW AL 106 455 375 66 129 32 4 1 62 62 0 8 3 15 0 0 13 8 .344 .441 .459 .900 *4
28 Dave Winfield 3.7 1992 40 TOR AL 156 670 583 92 169 33 3 26 108 82 10 89 1 1 3 10 2 3 .290 .377 .491 .867 *D9
29 Hank Aaron 3.5 1972 38 ATL NL 129 544 449 75 119 10 0 34 77 92 15 55 1 0 2 17 4 0 .265 .390 .514 .904 *39
30 Stan Musial 3.5 1962 41 STL NL 135 505 433 57 143 18 1 19 82 64 4 46 3 0 5 13 3 0 .330 .416 .508 .924 *79
31 Paul Molitor 3.4 1996 39 MIN AL 161 728 660 99 225 41 8 9 113 56 10 72 3 0 9 21 18 6 .341 .390 .468 .858 *D3
32 Willie Mays 3.4 1969 38 SFG NL 117 459 403 64 114 17 3 13 58 49 7 71 3 0 4 8 6 2 .283 .362 .437 .798 *8/93
33 Stan Musial 3.4 1958 37 STL NL 135 549 472 64 159 35 2 17 62 72 26 26 1 0 4 19 0 0 .337 .423 .528 .950 *3
34 Paul Molitor 3.3 1994 37 TOR AL 115 515 454 86 155 30 4 14 75 55 4 48 1 0 5 13 20 0 .341 .410 .518 .927 *D/3
35 Craig Biggio 3.2 2005 39 HOU NL 155 651 590 94 156 40 1 26 69 37 2 90 17 4 3 10 11 1 .264 .325 .468 .792 *4/D
36 Tris Speaker 3.2 1927 39 WSH AL 141 597 523 71 171 43 6 2 73 55 0 8 4 15 0 0 9 8 .327 .395 .444 .839 *83/9
37 Pete Rose 3.1 1978 37 CIN NL 159 729 655 103 198 51 3 7 52 62 6 30 3 2 7 8 13 9 .302 .362 .421 .783 *5/73
38 Cap Anson 3.0 1894 42 CHC NL 84 394 343 85 133 29 4 5 100 41 0 15 3 7 0 0 17 0 .388 .457 .539 .997 *3/4
39 Wade Boggs 2.9 1996 38 NYY AL 132 574 501 80 156 29 2 2 41 67 7 32 0 1 5 10 1 2 .311 .389 .389 .778 *5/D
40 Honus Wagner 2.9 1913 39 PIT NL 114 454 413 51 124 18 4 3 56 26 0 40 5 10 0 0 21 11 .300 .349 .385 .734 *6
41 Stan Musial 2.7 1961 40 STL NL 123 431 372 46 107 22 4 15 70 52 17 35 1 0 6 7 0 0 .288 .371 .489 .860 *7
42 Honus Wagner 2.7 1914 40 PIT NL 150 616 552 60 139 15 9 1 50 51 0 51 2 11 0 0 23 0 .252 .317 .317 .634 *65/3
43 Craig Biggio 2.6 2003 37 HOU NL 153 717 628 102 166 44 2 15 62 57 3 116 27 3 2 4 8 4 .264 .350 .412 .763 *8
44 Robin Yount 2.6 1993 37 MIL AL 127 514 454 62 117 25 3 8 51 44 5 93 5 5 6 12 9 2 .258 .326 .379 .705 *8/3D
45 Rickey Henderson 2.5 1998 39 OAK AL 152 670 542 101 128 16 1 14 57 118 0 114 5 2 3 5 66 13 .236 .376 .347 .723 *78
46 Pete Rose 2.5 1979 38 PHI NL 163 730 628 90 208 40 5 4 59 95 10 32 2 0 5 18 20 11 .331 .418 .430 .848 *3/54
47 Al Kaline 2.5 1972 37 DET AL 106 314 278 46 87 11 2 10 32 28 5 33 2 1 5 11 1 0 .313 .374 .475 .849 *93
48 Cap Anson 2.5 1896 44 CHC NL 108 459 402 72 133 18 2 2 90 49 0 10 3 5 0 0 24 0 .331 .407 .400 .808 *32
49 Cal Ripken 2.4 1999 38 BAL AL 86 354 332 51 113 27 0 18 57 13 3 31 3 3 3 14 0 1 .340 .368 .584 .952 *5
50 Cap Anson 2.4 1892 40 CHC NL 146 630 559 62 152 25 9 1 74 67 0 30 4 0 0 0 13 0 .272 .354 .354 .708 *3
51 Eddie Murray 2.2 1995 39 CLE AL 113 480 436 68 141 21 0 21 82 39 5 65 0 0 5 12 5 1 .323 .375 .516 .891 *D3
52 Rod Carew 2.2 1983 37 CAL AL 129 536 472 66 160 24 2 2 44 57 9 48 1 3 3 15 6 7 .339 .409 .411 .820 *3D/4
53 Carl Yastrzemski 2.2 1978 38 BOS AL 144 611 523 70 145 21 2 17 81 76 8 44 3 1 8 9 4 5 .277 .367 .423 .790 73D/8
54 Rickey Henderson 2.1 1996 37 SDP NL 148 602 465 110 112 17 2 9 29 125 2 90 10 0 2 5 37 15 .241 .410 .344 .754 *798
55 Eddie Collins 2.1 1927 40 PHA AL 95 290 226 50 76 12 1 1 15 56 0 9 0 8 0 0 6 2 .336 .468 .412 .880 *4/6
56 Cap Anson 2.1 1893 41 CHC NL 103 467 398 70 125 24 2 0 91 68 0 12 1 0 0 0 13 0 .314 .415 .384 .800 *3
57 Carl Yastrzemski 2.0 1979 39 BOS AL 147 590 518 69 140 28 1 21 87 62 8 46 2 0 8 12 3 3 .270 .346 .450 .796 D37/8
58 Wade Boggs 1.9 1997 39 NYY AL 104 407 353 55 103 23 1 4 28 48 3 38 0 2 4 3 0 1 .292 .373 .397 .769 *5D/1
59 Hank Aaron 1.9 1974 40 ATL NL 112 382 340 47 91 16 0 20 69 39 6 29 0 1 2 6 1 0 .268 .341 .491 .832 *7
60 Paul Waner 1.9 1943 40 BRO NL 82 267 225 29 70 16 0 1 26 35 0 9 1 6 0 9 0 0 .311 .406 .396 .802 *9/7
61 Honus Wagner 1.9 1916 42 PIT NL 123 484 432 45 124 15 9 1 39 34 0 36 8 10 0 0 11 0 .287 .350 .370 .721 *63/4
62 Tony Gwynn 1.8 1998 38 SDP NL 127 505 461 65 148 35 0 16 69 35 6 18 1 0 8 14 3 1 .321 .364 .501 .865 *9/D
63 Rickey Henderson 1.8 1997 38 TOT ML 120 509 403 84 100 14 0 8 34 97 2 85 6 1 2 10 45 8 .248 .400 .342 .742 *7D8/9
64 Willie Mays 1.8 1972 41 TOT NL 88 309 244 35 61 11 1 8 22 60 6 48 1 4 0 9 4 5 .250 .400 .402 .802 *83
65 Cap Anson 1.8 1895 43 CHC NL 122 545 474 87 159 23 6 2 91 55 0 23 3 13 0 0 12 0 .335 .408 .422 .830 *3
66 Rickey Henderson 1.7 1999 40 NYM NL 121 526 438 89 138 30 0 12 42 82 1 82 2 1 3 4 37 14 .315 .423 .466 .889 *7/D
67 Stan Musial 1.7 1960 39 STL NL 116 378 331 49 91 17 1 17 63 41 7 34 2 0 4 5 1 1 .275 .354 .486 .841 *73/9
68 Ty Cobb 1.7 1928 41 PHA AL 95 393 353 54 114 27 4 1 40 34 0 16 4 2 0 0 6 8 .323 .389 .431 .819 *9
69 Ty Cobb 1.7 1926 39 DET AL 79 273 233 48 79 18 5 4 62 26 0 2 1 13 0 0 9 4 .339 .408 .511 .918 *87/9
70 Tony Gwynn 1.6 1999 39 SDP NL 111 446 411 59 139 27 0 10 62 29 5 14 2 0 4 15 7 2 .338 .381 .477 .858 *9/D
71 Cal Ripken 1.6 1998 37 BAL AL 161 659 601 65 163 27 1 14 61 51 0 68 4 1 2 9 0 2 .271 .331 .389 .721 *5
72 Craig Biggio 1.4 2006 40 HOU NL 145 607 548 79 135 33 0 21 62 40 1 84 9 5 5 15 3 2 .246 .306 .422 .727 *4/D
73 Rafael Palmeiro 1.4 2003 38 TEX AL 154 654 561 92 146 21 2 38 112 84 9 77 5 0 4 7 2 0 .260 .359 .508 .867 *D3
74 Paul Molitor 1.4 1997 40 MIN AL 135 597 538 63 164 32 4 10 89 45 8 73 0 2 12 8 11 4 .305 .351 .435 .786 *D3
75 Pete Rose 1.4 1981 40 PHI NL 107 484 431 73 140 18 5 0 33 46 5 26 3 1 3 8 4 4 .325 .391 .390 .781 *3
76 Cal Ripken 1.3 2000 39 BAL AL 83 339 309 43 79 16 0 15 56 23 0 37 3 0 4 10 0 0 .256 .310 .453 .763 *5D
77 Carl Yastrzemski 1.2 1982 42 BOS AL 131 523 459 53 126 22 1 16 72 59 1 50 2 0 3 12 0 1 .275 .358 .431 .789 *D3/8
78 Stan Musial 1.2 1963 42 STL NL 124 379 337 34 86 10 2 12 58 35 9 43 2 0 5 3 2 0 .255 .325 .404 .728 *7
79 Eddie Murray 1.1 1993 37 NYM NL 154 659 610 77 174 28 1 27 100 40 4 61 0 0 9 24 2 2 .285 .325 .467 .792 *3
80 Lou Brock 1.1 1976 37 STL NL 133 544 498 73 150 24 5 4 67 35 7 75 1 4 6 19 56 19 .301 .344 .394 .738 *7
81 Cap Anson 1.1 1897 45 CHC NL 114 497 424 67 121 17 3 3 75 60 0 27 4 9 0 0 11 0 .285 .379 .361 .740 *32
82 Rafael Palmeiro 1.0 2004 39 BAL AL 154 651 550 68 142 29 0 23 88 86 15 61 6 0 9 15 2 1 .258 .359 .436 .796 *3D
83 Paul Waner 1.0 1941 38 TOT NL 106 385 329 45 88 10 2 2 50 55 0 14 0 1 0 10 1 0 .267 .372 .328 .701 *97/83
84 Paul Waner 0.9 1942 39 BSN NL 114 404 333 43 86 17 1 1 39 62 0 20 1 8 0 7 2 0 .258 .376 .324 .701 *9
85 Nap Lajoie 0.9 1915 40 PHA AL 129 520 490 40 137 24 5 1 61 11 0 16 4 15 0 0 10 6 .280 .301 .355 .656 *46/35
86 Craig Biggio 0.8 2004 38 HOU NL 156 700 633 100 178 47 0 24 63 40 0 94 15 9 3 8 7 2 .281 .337 .469 .806 *78/D
87 Pete Rose 0.8 1985 44 CIN NL 119 500 405 60 107 12 2 2 46 86 5 35 4 1 4 10 8 1 .264 .395 .319 .713 *3
88 Rickey Henderson 0.7 2001 42 SDP NL 123 465 379 70 86 17 3 8 42 81 0 84 3 0 2 8 25 7 .227 .366 .351 .717 *7/D
89 Wade Boggs 0.7 1998 40 TBD AL 123 483 435 51 122 23 4 7 52 46 6 54 0 0 2 13 3 2 .280 .348 .400 .748 *5D
90 Paul Waner 0.7 1940 37 PIT NL 89 261 238 32 69 16 1 1 32 23 0 14 0 0 0 4 0 0 .290 .352 .378 .731 *9/3
91 Tony Gwynn 0.6 2001 41 SDP NL 71 112 102 5 33 9 1 1 17 10 1 9 0 0 0 1 1 0 .324 .384 .461 .845 9/D
92 Dave Winfield 0.6 1991 39 CAL AL 150 633 568 75 149 27 4 28 86 56 4 109 1 2 6 21 7 2 .262 .326 .472 .798 *9D
93 Rod Carew 0.6 1984 38 CAL AL 93 378 329 42 97 8 1 3 31 40 1 39 0 5 4 8 4 3 .295 .367 .353 .720 *3/D
94 Carl Yastrzemski 0.6 1981 41 BOS AL 91 390 338 36 83 14 1 7 53 49 4 28 0 0 3 10 0 1 .246 .338 .355 .693 *D3
95 Al Kaline 0.6 1974 39 DET AL 147 630 558 71 146 28 2 13 64 65 2 75 1 1 5 12 2 2 .262 .337 .389 .726 *D
96 Paul Waner 0.6 1944 41 TOT ML 92 173 143 17 40 4 1 0 17 29 0 8 0 1 0 3 1 0 .280 .401 .322 .723 9/7
97 Rafael Palmeiro 0.5 2005 40 BAL AL 110 422 369 47 98 13 0 18 60 43 4 43 2 0 8 9 2 0 .266 .339 .447 .786 *3D
98 Rickey Henderson 0.5 2000 41 TOT ML 123 519 420 75 98 14 2 4 32 88 1 75 4 3 4 11 36 11 .233 .368 .305 .673 *7/D
99 Dave Winfield 0.5 1990 38 TOT AL 132 537 475 70 127 21 2 21 78 52 3 81 2 1 7 17 0 1 .267 .338 .453 .790 *97D
100 Rod Carew 0.5 1985 39 CAL AL 127 518 443 69 124 17 3 2 39 64 9 47 1 9 1 8 5 5 .280 .371 .345 .717 *3
101 Rickey Henderson 0.4 2002 43 BOS AL 72 222 179 40 40 6 1 5 16 38 0 47 4 0 1 3 8 2 .223 .369 .352 .721 *7/D89
102 George Brett 0.4 1991 38 KCR AL 131 572 505 77 129 40 2 10 61 58 10 75 0 1 8 20 2 0 .255 .327 .402 .729 *D3
103 Pete Rose 0.4 1984 43 TOT NL 121 421 374 43 107 15 2 0 34 40 4 27 3 3 1 11 1 1 .286 .359 .337 .696 *37
104 Hank Aaron 0.4 1976 42 MIL AL 85 308 271 22 62 8 0 10 35 35 1 38 0 0 2 8 0 1 .229 .315 .369 .684 *D/7
105 Tony Gwynn 0.3 2000 40 SDP NL 36 140 127 17 41 12 0 1 17 9 2 4 1 0 3 4 0 1 .323 .364 .441 .805 *9/D
106 Paul Molitor 0.3 1995 38 TOR AL 130 598 525 63 142 31 2 15 60 61 1 57 5 3 4 10 12 0 .270 .350 .423 .772 *D
107 Carl Yastrzemski 0.3 1980 40 BOS AL 105 412 364 49 100 21 1 15 50 44 5 38 0 1 3 9 0 2 .275 .350 .462 .812 D73/98
108 Tris Speaker 0.3 1928 40 PHA AL 64 212 191 28 51 22 2 3 30 10 0 5 2 9 0 0 5 1 .267 .310 .450 .761 *8/79
109 Rickey Henderson 0.2 2003 44 LAD NL 30 84 72 7 15 1 0 2 5 11 0 16 1 0 0 0 3 0 .208 .321 .306 .627 *7
110 Al Kaline 0.2 1973 38 DET AL 91 347 310 40 79 13 0 10 45 29 4 28 3 0 5 10 4 1 .255 .320 .394 .713 *93
111 Paul Molitor 0.1 1998 41 MIN AL 126 559 502 75 141 29 5 4 69 45 5 41 1 1 10 19 9 2 .281 .335 .382 .718 *D/3
112 Willie Mays 0.1 1973 42 NYM NL 66 239 209 24 44 10 0 6 25 27 0 47 1 1 1 7 1 0 .211 .303 .344 .647 *83
113 Eddie Collins 0.1 1928 41 PHA AL 36 37 33 3 10 3 0 0 7 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 .303 .378 .394 .772 /46
114 Derek Jeter 0.0 2011 37 NYY AL 65 312 280 40 72 12 1 2 22 24 0 33 4 0 4 6 7 2 .257 .321 .329 .649 *6/D
115 George Brett 0.0 1992 39 KCR AL 152 637 592 55 169 35 5 7 61 35 6 69 6 0 4 15 8 6 .285 .330 .397 .727 *D3/5
116 Lou Brock 0.0 1979 40 STL NL 120 436 405 56 123 15 4 5 38 23 1 43 3 0 5 7 21 12 .304 .342 .398 .739 *7
117 Hank Aaron 0.0 1975 41 MIL AL 137 543 465 45 109 16 2 12 60 70 3 51 1 1 6 15 0 1 .234 .332 .355 .687 *D/7
118 Paul Waner 0.0 1945 42 NYY AL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   1.000      
119 Eddie Collins 0.0 1930 43 PHA AL 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .500 .500 .500 1.000  
120 Eddie Collins -0.1 1929 42 PHA AL 9 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 .222 .000 .222  
121 Dave Winfield -0.2 1994 42 MIN AL 77 328 294 35 74 15 3 10 43 31 5 51 0 1 2 7 2 1 .252 .321 .425 .746 *D/9
122 Dave Winfield -0.2 1993 41 MIN AL 143 594 547 72 148 27 2 21 76 45 2 106 0 0 2 15 2 3 .271 .325 .442 .767 *D9/3
123 Stan Musial -0.2 1959 38 STL NL 115 404 341 37 87 13 2 14 44 60 11 25 0 0 3 12 0 2 .255 .364 .428 .792 *3/7
124 Wade Boggs -0.3 1999 41 TBD AL 90 334 292 40 88 14 1 2 29 38 2 23 0 0 4 14 1 0 .301 .377 .377 .754 *5/D31
125 Eddie Murray -0.3 1994 38 CLE AL 108 467 433 57 110 21 1 17 76 31 6 53 0 0 3 8 8 4 .254 .302 .425 .727 *D3
126 Nap Lajoie -0.3 1914 39 CLE AL 121 468 419 37 108 14 3 0 50 32 0 15 2 15 0 0 14 15 .258 .313 .305 .619 *43
127 George Brett -0.4 1993 40 KCR AL 145 612 560 69 149 31 3 19 75 39 9 67 3 0 10 20 7 5 .266 .312 .434 .746 *D
128 Carl Yastrzemski -0.4 1983 43 BOS AL 119 437 380 38 101 24 0 10 56 54 11 29 2 0 1 13 0 0 .266 .359 .408 .767 *D/37
129 Pete Rose -0.4 1980 39 PHI NL 162 735 655 95 185 42 1 1 64 66 5 33 6 4 4 13 12 8 .282 .352 .354 .706 *3
130 Honus Wagner -0.4 1917 43 PIT NL 74 264 230 15 61 7 1 0 24 24 0 17 1 9 0 0 5 0 .265 .337 .304 .642 *35/46
131 Cal Ripken -0.5 2001 40 BAL AL 128 516 477 43 114 16 0 14 68 26 1 63 2 2 9 15 0 2 .239 .276 .361 .637 *5D
132 Lou Brock -0.5 1977 38 STL NL 141 521 489 69 133 22 6 2 46 30 2 74 2 0 0 6 35 24 .272 .317 .354 .670 *7
133 Nap Lajoie -0.6 1916 41 PHA AL 113 455 426 33 105 14 4 2 35 14 0 26 1 14 0 0 15 0 .246 .272 .312 .584 *4/37
134 Eddie Murray -0.8 1996 40 TOT AL 152 637 566 69 147 21 1 22 79 61 6 87 0 0 10 19 4 0 .260 .327 .417 .743 *D/3
135 Pete Rose -0.8 1982 41 PHI NL 162 718 634 80 172 25 4 3 54 66 9 32 7 8 3 12 8 8 .271 .345 .338 .683 *3
136 Pete Rose -1.0 1986 45 CIN NL 72 272 237 15 52 8 2 0 25 30 0 31 4 0 1 2 3 0 .219 .316 .270 .586 *3
137 Eddie Murray -1.1 1997 41 TOT ML 55 185 167 13 37 7 0 3 18 15 0 26 0 0 3 10 1 0 .222 .281 .317 .598 *D
138 Dave Winfield -1.1 1995 43 CLE AL 46 130 115 11 22 5 0 2 4 14 2 26 1 0 0 5 1 0 .191 .285 .287 .572 *D
139 Craig Biggio -1.5 2007 41 HOU NL 141 555 517 68 130 31 3 10 50 23 0 112 3 7 5 5 4 3 .251 .285 .381 .666 *4/D2
140 Pete Rose -1.8 1983 42 PHI NL 151 555 493 52 121 14 3 0 45 52 5 28 2 1 7 11 7 7 .245 .316 .286 .602 *39/7
141 Lou Brock -1.9 1978 39 STL NL 92 317 298 31 66 9 0 0 12 17 2 29 0 1 1 4 17 5 .221 .263 .252 .514 *7
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 7/8/2011.

.

43 Responses to “Best Age 37+ Seasons By Members Of 2,998 Hit Club”

  1. Michael Says:

    The question I have is....who on earth is this referencing??

    /sarcasm

    Seriously...you have to stand in awe of Honus Wagner's numbers...

  2. w.k.kortas Says:

    The 2,998 hit club? Is that a special one-time markdown from 3,000?

  3. Kahuna Tuna Says:

    Could you open the door a crack for 2,654-hit man Ted Williams and his age-38 season in 1957? Slash stats .388/.526/.731 in 132 games, 38 HR, 87 RBI, 9.9 WAR.

    I always have to remind myself that all that military service left Williams shy of 3,000 hits.

  4. Dan Says:

    How 'bout that Cap Anson, huh?

  5. Deacon Drake Says:

    Boy... Eddie Murray was on some sort of death march...

  6. El Dandy Says:

    So what we're saying is...Jeter is having the worst season ever for a 37 year old in the (soon to be) 3000 hit club? Everyone below him is 38 and up, after all.

  7. Mets Maven Says:

    How about that Honus Wagner?

  8. Doug B Says:

    Murray may have been bad but Pete Rose was worse. He played 7 seasons in the 1980's.

    His combined WAR for the 1980's was -1.4

    Yet somehow in that decade he made 4 all-star teams, won a silver slugger at first base with zero home runs, and finished 10th in the MVP once.

    the myth of batting average ruled welll into the 1980's that's for sure. I mean seriously... who wins a silver slugger at first base with no home runs and 33 RBI?

  9. El Dandy Says:

    Another thing I noticed:

    Combined WAR for each player at 37 and up:
    Cap Anson: 30.2 (9 seasons)
    Honus Wagner: 26.9 (7 seasons)
    Willie Mays: 23.4 (6 seasons)
    Ty Cobb: 18.8 (5 seasons)
    Hank Aaron: 17.2 (6 seasons)
    Eddie Collins: 16.4 (7 seasons)
    Tris Speaker: 14.5 (4 seasons)
    Stan Musial: 12.3 (6 seasons)
    Carl Yastrzemski: 10.4 (7 seasons)
    Rickey Henderson: 9.9 (8 seasons)
    Nap Lajoie: 9.5 (5 seasons)
    Tony Gwynn: 9.5 (5 seasons)
    Paul Molitor: 8.5 (5 seasons)
    Wade Boggs: 8.3 (5 seasons)
    Rafael Palmeiro: 7.1 (4 seasons)
    Craig Biggio: 6.5 (5 seasons)
    Paul Waner: 5.1 (6 seasons)
    Cal Ripken: 4.8 (4 seasons)
    George Brett: 4.6 (4 seasons)
    Roberto Clemente: 4.4 (1 season)
    Pete Rose: 4.2 (9 seasons)
    Al Kaline: 3.3 (3 seasons)
    Dave Winfield: 3.3 (6 seasons)
    Rod Carew: 3.3 (3 seasons)
    Robin Yount: 2.6 (1 season)
    Eddie Murray: 1.1 (5 seasons)
    Derek Jeter: 0.0 (1 season)
    Lou Brock: -1.3 (4 seasons)

  10. Doug Says:

    Top 3 WAR for this group, by age.

    37: Wagner, Aaron, Mays
    38: Wagner, Cobb, Anson
    39: Mays, Aaron, Anson
    40: Mays, Cobb, Winfield
    41: Wagner, Musial, Anson
    42: Anson, Wagner, Musial/Yaz (tie)
    43: Anson, Rose, Henderson
    44: Anson, Rose, Henderson

  11. Doug B Says:

    I wonder how Clemente would have finished.

    🙁

    Of course everyone is neglecting to mention the guy who put up a 12.4 WAR at age 39. He's not on the list because he "only" has 2,935 hits to go with his 2,558 walks. That just ain't natural!

  12. Doug Says:

    @9.

    As a point of reference, I checked out Julio Franco, just because of his longevity.

    He tallied 6.1 WAR in 9 seasons (I'm excluding his 1-game season in 1999) aged 37 or older, with positive WAR every year but one. Numbers were unspectacular (7 times between 0.1 and 0.8 WAR), but I'm impressed that a 48 year-old could still be playing above replacement level, albeit in a very limited role (106 PA).

  13. Doug B Says:

    my 40+ lineup probably looks something like this:

    1 - Lopes 2B (R) - (you try finding a second baseman!)
    2 - Cobb CF (L)
    3 - Bonds LF/RF (L)
    4 - Wagner SS/utility (R)
    5 - Musial LF/1B (L)
    6 - Fisk C (R)
    7 - Evans 3B/1B (L)
    8 - Appling SS/3B (R)
    9 - either Mays or Aaron RF (R) - (I could not decide)

    It's amazing that SS was the one infield position with so many to pick from. I had to cut Anson as Cobb already claimed the position as top racist and I needed a centerfielder.

    DH of course would rotate. You don't expect these guys to play every day in the field do you?

  14. John Q Says:

    @11 Doug,

    I've often wondered what would have happened to the Pirates from 1973-1975 had Clemente lived. I think the Pirates would have won the mediocre NL east in 1973 then who knows what would have happened in the NLCS.

    It's interesting to think how the Pirates would have handled the glut of good outfielders they had at that time, Stargell, Oliver, Parker, Zisk and Clemente. Maybe the Pirates would have traded Oliver and gotten a real Center Fielder, who knows.

  15. BillyPhilly Says:

    So Aaron has his highest home run season at age 37 and no talk of the juice?

  16. Doug B Says:

    going from 45 homers to 47 is a little different than going from 49 to 73.

  17. Thomas Court Says:

    Ichiro has 3620 career hits if you count his totals from Nippon pro ball in Japan. He is 8 months older than Jeter (even though they are both listed by BR as 37).

    I like that BR has recently updated the minor league stats. When are they going to port in the stats from Japanese leagues? Ichiro's stats from his Nippon playing days have been available on ESPN for years. I like ESPN - but I want Baseball Reference to be my one stop shopping place for baseball stats.

  18. John Q Says:

    @8 Doug,

    Pete Rose was done as a productive everyday player in the major leagues by 1980 but somehow he was able to get 3685 plate appearances from 1980-1986 mostly at first base! To put it in perspective Rose was basically a full-time 1B and he hit .274 with 6HR and 301 RBI's during this time period!! And then Rose at 40 was at best a mediocre fielder.

    It's probably one of the rare times in MLB history that a team made it to the WS twice in 4 years with essentially no production from their 1b.

    The Phillies won in '80, '81, '83 because they had Carlton who was the best pitcher in baseball from 1980-1983 and Mike Schmidt who was the best position player in baseball from 1980-1983 and then throw in John Denny's fluke season in '83 and a decent supporting cast.

    Playing Rose at 1b cost the Phillies a division in '82 and he probably cost the Reds a division in '85.

  19. John Q Says:

    @8 Doug,

    Yeah it is mind-boggling they gave Rose the SS at first with 0 HR and 33 RBI. I know it was the strike year, but that's just a terrible job. Hernandez should have won it that year.

    For the longest time I thought they just gave the Silver Slugger to the player who had the highest batting average at his position. I didn't learn until much later that it was a subjective award. I'm not sure but for the first few years, I think they just voted for the guy with the highest average.

  20. Nash Bruce Says:

    @18: regarding the '85 Reds season: Well, you have to put some of the blame on the Reds manager- at that point, who in their right mind, would keep running Rose out there to play everyday, ??

  21. Doug Says:

    @13.

    Nice work on 40+ team, Doug.

    You're right about the second baseman - slim pickings. But, I can't agree with Davey Lopes, if only because he almost never played 2nd base after age 40. To be precise, he played at 2nd in one game (out of 242) after age 40.

    Some other possibilities:
    - Eddie Collins was a 2.1 WAR after age 40, but it was all in his age 40 season, and he only played 58 games at 2nd after age 40
    - Biggio had two full seasons at 2nd base, one okay (1.4), one not (-1.5, and mostly because of defense)
    - Lajoie also had two more-or-less full seasons at 2nd. oWAR was 1.8, but dWAR was -1.5 (negative both years)

    But, maybe our man should be Rabbit Maranville. Like Biggio and Lajoie, he had 2 full seasons (and a bit of a 3rd season) at 2nd. His WAR is bad (-2.2). But, he placed in the MVP voting in both his age 40 and age 41 seasons, while playing for a middle of the pack club. So, maybe his contemporaries were seeing something that we're missing in the numbers.

  22. TapDancingTeddy Says:

    @9 and 10: Thank you. That's good stuff to look at.

  23. Will Short Says:

    If you aren't going to include the batting averages, don't bother.

  24. -mark Says:

    For what it is worth, Bill James has the following team of "oldies" (35+)

    C - Carlton Fisk
    1B - Cap Anson
    2B - Nap Lajoie
    3B - Pete Rose
    SS - Honus Wagner
    OF - Ted Williams
    OF - Willie Mays
    OF - Babe Ruth
    SP - Cy Young
    SP - Phil Niekro
    SP - Jack Quinn
    SP - Warren Spahn
    RP - Hoyt Wilhelm

    Based on his Win-Shares system.

  25. Timmy P Says:

    @20 For your information Nash, although I hail from Wahoo Nebraska, and attended Boys Town in Nebraska in junior high and some high school, I have lived and worked in Asia and South America for extended periods. Except for the east coast I have also lived and worked all over the USA for extended periods of time. I am not a beer drinker, I have made it clear in the past my fondness for Johnny Walker black label, although I try not to post after I've had 3. Makes me sad that calling someone all-American would spark a negative reaction.

  26. Neil L. Says:

    Yawn, ho-hum. May DJ forever be fated to obscurity!

    So will someone from the NY market please explain to me why Derek Jeter's ego will not allow him to bat ninth in the lineup. He didn't even want to go on the DL for cryin' out loud. Is it all about Derek or about the Yamkees winning games?

  27. Charlie C Says:

    @20 @18 - who would play instead of Rose? Pete Rose led the '85 Reds in OBP (.395) - .264 BA and 86 BB in 500 PA - his stats are not typical for a firstbaseman, but it seems to me that they needed him in the line-up -

  28. Ken Says:

    @18: Rose was bad by '85, but he certainly didn't cost the Reds the division. They finished 5.5 games out, with Rose putting up 0.8 WAR. The team had no young 1B to speak of, and certainly nobody that was going to put up a 7 WAR season (in fact, no 1B did that season).

    Rose's worth was of course much more about the ticket sales than value on the field in '85. The Reds attendance rose about 50% from the prior year based on Rose chasing the hit record.

  29. DaveKingman Says:

    I always loved that 1971 Hank Aaron season. He received zero 1st place MVP votes.

    The man had a hammer.

  30. Timmy P Says:

    Berkman hit another homer! If the Cardinals win their division, Berkman = MVP!

  31. John Q Says:

    @28 Ken,

    Well the Reds and Rose decided during the winter of '84-85 That Rose was going to be the full-time 1B and they were going to support Rose in his chase for the Hits record. Essentially by making this decision they were putting winning second to chasing a record and as a result they never bothered to look for a full-time 1B during the off-season.

    You can chase a record & money if you're a bad ball club but the Reds were a very good team in 1985.

    They didn't even have to look for a full time 1b, they could have switched Nick Esasky to 1B and brought up Eric Davis to play LF. Paul O'neil was also on the verge of coming up but was blocked in the log jam in the outfield. Maybe they could have switched Dave Parker to 1b.

    The Reds only played 161 games in 1985 so they realistically could have been 5 games out. You didn't need a 7 WAR 1B to win, they could have had a 3-4 WAR 1B which would have cut the lead to 1-2 games and which would have made things interesting.

    As far as Rose goes, yes he did have a .395 on base percentage but he had no power. He had a .319 slugging percentage which was ranked 23/23 among 1b with at least 450 plate appearances. His .264 batting average ranked 22/23 1b with at least 450 plate appearances. Then on top of it, his defense wasn't very good because he was 44 years old.

  32. John Autin Says:

    @17, Thomas Court -- I, too, would love to see the Japanese stats more readily available on B-R. But they're still minor leagues.

    Jeter would have 3,548 hits if we counted his hits from the minors.

  33. John Autin Says:

    John Q -- I know that Pete Rose was, taking his Phillies years as a whole, a subpar performer on the field.

    Yet while I can't possibly quantify Rose's "intangibles" against those of anyone else, I still think he was a player who brought a lot to a team beyond his hits, runs and outs.

    Have you read Joe Posnanski's book about the '75 Reds, "The Machine"? His description of Rose's mid-season shift from OF to 3B -- a position where he'd only ever played 16 games, and that 9 years before -- helped me appreciate what a team player Rose was. And isn't that something those Phillies needed?

  34. Thomas Court Says:

    @32

    I think the Japanese leagues are a little better than minor leagues over here. Mind you, the only evidence I have to support this statement is that there have been only two World Baseball Classic tournaments - and Japan has won them both. I think it is safe to assume that during Ichiro's playing days in Japan that he was playing with and against many players who were major league caliber.

    Also consider that Ichiro actually averages more hits per game in the Majors than he did in Japan. He only had one season of 200 hits in Japan. Ichiro’s extra base hits, average, BB/SO, SB/CS and OPS numbers all took the expected reduction that one would have expected for a player moving from Nippon to the Majors. They did not fall off the table completely, but there are decreases that are visible to the naked eye without breaking out the calculator. But you know the one stat that didn’t decrease? His hits. His hits/game average has actually increased since arriving in the Majors:

    Should we discount his hit total somehow? The numbers argue more in favor of augmenting them. His 1,278 hits while playing in Japan have already been discounted by the fact that he played in a maximum of 135 games a season (which he only did once). I say we can split the difference and just leave the numbers where they are.

  35. MLS Says:

    @23..Totally agree..BA=what the player actually did VS OBP=what the player could've done. OBP is bad science, always has been, will always be. Especially if you apply it to middle of the order guys. I consider OBP for middle of the order guys is like managers hitting lefties against righties..it's part of the game..playing the odds! Example: Dawson (.323 OBP) scored a run 39% every time he reached base BUT if you discount his HRS..he scored 31% of the time. Whereas, McGwire(.394 OBP) scored a run 39% of the time as well BUT...when you discount his HRS..he scored only 24 % of the time. In other words..managers/pitchers knew what they were doing when they walked that slug McGwire...they played the odds. I can not believe comman sense doesn't prevail on this subject!

  36. MLS Says:

    One more comment about OBP. If this game is about scoring (in which I believe it its) and if one looks at OBP as the driving force of scoring runs (which I think it SHOULD be)...then tell me this...why on earth isn't Kenny Lofton in the HOF?? The man scored a run 45% of the time he reached base and the only man I have come with better than him is DiMaggio at 46 %. IF you insist on OBP is pertinant...please apply it properly!!!

  37. BSK Says:

    MLS-

    The percentage of times scored is based on numerous factors completely out of the players control. The player's power, speed, and baserunning contribute, but he is still dependent upon his teammates to drive him in. Lofton played on high scoring teams with great offenses, which is why he scored so frequently. He was a great player, and if you look through the archives you will see that he has received quite a bit of HOF support here (more than he's getting amongst the general public), partly based on his great OBP skills. But to penalize a guy for not scoring frequently is unfair; the stat is too context dependent.

    OBP is not about what could happen; just like BA, it is about what did happen. During what percentage of the player's PA did he succeed in not making an out? It is a direct recording of what has happened on the field.

  38. BSK Says:

    JA-

    Scouts I've read said that the Japanese leagues probably split the difference between the highest level of the Minors (debatable as to whether this is AAA or AA based on how talent is distributed) and the Majors. It's not exactly fair to dismiss it as Minor leagues, but also hard to consider it Major league quality. Personally, I think the fact that it was the Japanese Major Leagues matter. In the Minors, players have different objectives. Some are working on developing pitches or rehabbing or doing things other than trying to do their best on the field. In the Majors, be it America or Japan, the competition is at its best. I think this counts for something.

    In the end, I think that Ichiro will reach the HOF because of what he's done here, both on and off the field; the voters will certainly take into account his impact (just as voters did in choosing him for the MVP and MLB did when choosing his rookie season as the best "moment", as stupid as that was). My feeling is that he will deserve it even without these things.

  39. MLS Says:

    With all due respect BSK...what you and MANY others don't factor into the equation is what you actually eluded to "it's a direct recording of what happened on the ball field". Don't you think mgrs/pitchers don't KNOW what type of hitters that are behind other hitters? Ponder that question for a moment. Like a light going off...you too will come to your senses. OBP is the direct correlation of HOW the game is played...it's all about the odds...the situations...the tempo...what type of team an individual is playing on...ect..ect. Like I said...BA is what the player actually did hitting the ball...OBP is more times than not..the "direction" the opposing teams will allow a player to get on. It's NOT entirely in the hands of the player....and SHOULD be viewed that way!!

  40. MLS Says:

    I have debated this OBP issue many times. Phrases like "don't let this guy beat you" and "don't give this guy anything good to hit" among others have LONG been standard in baseball.To ignore basic fundamentals of the game by saying a player didn't make an out is ridiculus...IF he didn't SCORE while reaching base...it's a win for the opposing team...and correct me if I'm wrong..that's WHAT this game is all about....SCORING!!! There's a REASON why McGwire had a high OBP...because he was more dangerous at the plate than he was on the basepaths...and the mgrs/pitchers knew this. Give them credit. If getting on base was the PRIMARY focus in a game...explain the Williams/Ortiz shifts..a bunt down the 3rd base line gets them on base almost every time!!! That's BETTER than making an out isn't it????

  41. BSK Says:

    MLS-

    I understand your point, but that is a bit simplistic. Just because strategy has been utilized doesn't mean it is ideal. It is rare that an intentional walk or semi-intentional walk is actually the ideal strategy. Yet, the practice continues. I do realize that how a batter is pitched to impacts his OBP; some guys will see sudden jumps in OBP relative to BA as a function of increased power with no discernible difference in their batting eye. Yet, the fact remains: the batter came to the plate and reached safely. We could make the same argument against BA. Yes, he hit the ball for a hit, but it also was a confluence of his approach, his swing, the pitcher's approach, the positioning and competency of the fielders, etc, etc, etc.

    Multiple studies have been completed that demonstrated the importance of OBP over pretty much any other basic stat. It's been shown here that going 0 for 1 with 3 walks is better than going 1 for 4 with a HR. There is objective data stating this. The argument that McGwire was more dangerous in the box than on the bases is a false dilemma. Only when a guy has a SLUG beyond 1.000 (meaning he averages a base per AB) does it become better to walk him than allow him to hit away. And this is so rarely achieved as to make the practice pretty foolish.

  42. John Autin Says:

    @34, Thomas -- Even if I were to agree that the top Japanese league is better than the highest U.S. minor league (I don't, but never mind), that's still nothing like an argument for considering any of Ichiro's hits in Japan as being "major-league hits," nor for considering his play in Japan as part of his HOF credentials.

    By the way, I do think that he'll make the HOF based only on his MLB achievements.

    But while I don't dispute that Ichiro faced "many players who were major league caliber" in Japan, there are many other players who played several years in minor leagues that were at least as close to MLB-caliber as the leagues Ichiro played in.

    I speak in particular of the Pacific Coast League in the 1920s and early '30s. If we give HOF credit for Ichiro's Japanese career, then what about someone like Lefty O'Doul, who had 4 huge years in the PCL (1924-27, batted .375 or higher 3 times, including a 309-hit season), then returned to the majors and hit almost exactly the same for 4 years?

    What about Buzz Arlett? In his only year in the majors, Arlett was a fine hitter; his 138 OPS+ was better than Ichiro's best. But Arlett amassed over 2,700 hits and 400+ HRs in the high minors, mostly in the PCL.

    What about Ox Eckhardt, who had a .369 BA at the highest levels of the minors and racked up 2,773 hits, but barely got a cup of coffee in the majors?

    And what about Hector Espino, considered the greatest player in the history of the Mexican League? Liga Mexicana has sent way more stars to the majors than the Japanese leagues.

  43. MLS Says:

    I believe we both agree on many points about OBP, but you have to admit there are many "variables" concerning this stat. It's my thought that OBP is a stat that IF applied should be weighted as to where the batter is in the line-up. BA has no such "variables"..the stat should be viewed as how consistant a player "hits" ML pitchers..nothing more..nothing less. OBP has always left me with more questions than answers. I know it's "valuable" that a player doesn't make an out, but even that is a false assumption (sac fly and bunts). Also, I know standing on 1st base is NOT in scoring position and there's those little pesky Williams/Ortiz shifts that defys OBP logic (if there's logic behind it).Too many variables in which to lay my hat on tis all BSK.