Jonathan Papelbon and highest fraction of saves in relief appearances
Posted by Andy on June 10, 2011
Jonathan Papelbon recently recorded his 200th career save and he did it in fewer appearances than any other pitcher. His rapidity in reaching the milestone is an indicator not only of his skill but also just how specifically he has been used. Papelbon has pitched very rarely in non-save situations.
Here are the 14 pitchers who had saves in at least half of their games in relief:
Rk | Player | SV | GR | From | To | Age | G | GS | CG | SHO | GF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Trevor Hoffman | 601 | 1035 | 1993 | 2010 | 25-42 | 1035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 856 |
2 | Mariano Rivera | 575 | 994 | 1995 | 2011 | 25-41 | 1004 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 850 |
3 | Dennis Eckersley | 390 | 710 | 1975 | 1998 | 20-43 | 1071 | 361 | 100 | 20 | 577 |
4 | Troy Percival | 358 | 702 | 1995 | 2009 | 25-39 | 703 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 546 |
5 | John Wetteland | 330 | 601 | 1989 | 2000 | 22-33 | 618 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 523 |
6 | Francisco Rodriguez | 285 | 561 | 2002 | 2011 | 20-29 | 561 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 433 |
7 | Jonathan Papelbon | 200 | 356 | 2005 | 2011 | 24-30 | 359 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 303 |
8 | Eric Gagne | 187 | 354 | 1999 | 2008 | 23-32 | 402 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 269 |
9 | Bryan Harvey | 177 | 322 | 1987 | 1995 | 24-32 | 322 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 278 |
10 | Bobby Jenks | 173 | 344 | 2005 | 2011 | 24-30 | 344 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 284 |
11 | John Smoltz | 154 | 242 | 1988 | 2009 | 21-42 | 723 | 481 | 53 | 16 | 204 |
12 | Brian Wilson | 151 | 284 | 2006 | 2011 | 24-29 | 284 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 212 |
13 | Joakim Soria | 139 | 264 | 2007 | 2011 | 23-27 | 264 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 207 |
14 | Kazuhiro Sasaki | 129 | 228 | 2000 | 2003 | 32-35 | 228 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 201 |
Below these guys, there are no pitchers with more than a handful of saves.
Notice how these guys are all modern, with Bryan Harvey the old man in this group if we ignore Eckersley. Harvey was one of the earliest of the modern-day 1-inning closers following in the footsteps of Eckersley.
Check out the guys right around Papelbon in career saves:
Rk | Player | SV | From | To | Age | G | GS | CG | SHO | GF | W | L | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | HR | BF | IBB | HBP | BK | WP | Tm | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40 | Jeff Shaw | 203 | 1990 | 2001 | 23-34 | 633 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 384 | 34 | 54 | .386 | 848.0 | 821 | 368 | 334 | 234 | 545 | 3.54 | 120 | 91 | 3549 | 44 | 25 | 1 | 18 | CLE-MON-TOT-CIN-LAD |
41 | Bobby Thigpen | 201 | 1986 | 1994 | 22-30 | 448 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 356 | 31 | 36 | .463 | 568.2 | 537 | 237 | 217 | 238 | 376 | 3.43 | 119 | 56 | 2448 | 28 | 23 | 4 | 12 | CHW-TOT-SEA |
42 | Jonathan Papelbon | 200 | 2005 | 2011 | 24-30 | 359 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 303 | 21 | 18 | .538 | 391.0 | 299 | 118 | 103 | 110 | 458 | 2.37 | 195 | 30 | 1586 | 10 | 16 | 0 | 10 | BOS |
43 | Brian Fuentes | 198 | 2001 | 2011 | 25-35 | 579 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 356 | 23 | 40 | .365 | 551.2 | 452 | 231 | 211 | 233 | 591 | 3.44 | 137 | 53 | 2349 | 25 | 49 | 2 | 29 | SEA-COL-LAA-TOT-OAK |
44 | Mike Henneman | 193 | 1987 | 1996 | 25-34 | 561 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 432 | 57 | 42 | .576 | 732.2 | 686 | 301 | 261 | 271 | 533 | 3.21 | 131 | 47 | 3112 | 82 | 19 | 2 | 48 | DET-TOT-TEX |
Papelbon has 356 career games in relief. Of those, 234 (66%) were save situations and 200 (56%) eventually became saves.
Let's run the same numbers for the others:
- Jeff Shaw had 614 games in relief. Of those, 302 (49%) were save situations and 203 (33%) became saves.
- Bobby Thigpen had 448 games in relief. Of those, 264 (59%) were save situations and 201 (45%) became saves.
- Brian Fuentes has 579 games in relief. Of those, 298 (51%) have been save situations and 198 (34%) have become saves.
- Mike Henneman had 561 games in relief. Of those, 268 (48%) were save situations and 193 (34%) became saves.
So, Papelbon has much higher percentages in both categories than all the rest of these guys. This is, of course, because he's been a premiere closer for his entire career. The other guys above spent some time (usually at the beginning or end of their careers) as a middle reliever. It's not hard to imagine Papelbon becoming an 8th inning guy one day, so his own percentages may decline considerably over time.
June 10th, 2011 at 9:12 am
Does anyone know how long the current save definition has been in effect and what the success percentage is?
June 10th, 2011 at 9:16 am
haven't a few guys flipped recently (Soria? or Soriano?) for being used in non-save situations.
Andy, I know this is a pet peeve of yours and just about every other sensible soul on our sight, but seeing a manager wait because he has a 4 run lead in the 9th, till the 'inferior' reliever has loaded the bases and turned it into a save situation, the- and only then bring in his ace.
Or you and others have pointed out, that the highest leverage situation usually occurs in the 7th innings.
June 10th, 2011 at 9:37 am
Hey Andy did you see that graphic I emailed you about Berkman's home run last night? I'm not exaggerating the distance on that thing, it was huge! I estimate it to be 627' 4 " if it would have been allowed full flight. The replay is available on MLB.com and watch where the ball hits the roof at :45.
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?gid=2011_06_09_slnmlb_houmlb_1&mode=video
June 10th, 2011 at 10:52 am
Re #1, I think it was 1969, there's a whole big writeup about it on one of the save-related blog posts from a little while ago.
How managers use their relief pitchers in MLB is equally as stupid as how football coaches manage 4th downs.
June 10th, 2011 at 11:14 am
I actually chuckled when I read Paplebon was a "premiere closer". The guy had a 3.90 ERA last year and currently a 4.50 ERA this year. He will be forgotten about within a couple of years.
June 10th, 2011 at 11:29 am
JR- I'm not a huge Papelbon fan, but he's got a K rate just under 12 and a BB rate under 2. That's elite, especially given his HR numbers.
ERA is often misleading for guys who throw so few innings, in fact, early in his career, Papelbon posted absurd ERAs when he should have been around 3.00.
His ERA this year should be under 3.00. He's been elite this season.
Now would I count on that into the future, I don't know.
June 10th, 2011 at 2:16 pm
@5 @6.
Papelbon usually gets the job done but, strictly anecdotally, I've seldom seen a game where he has an easy time of it. My impession is it almost always seems to be something of a struggle before he finishes things off.
Perhaps, it's just because he's such a slow worker. But the impression you get from a typical Papelbon outing vs. a typical Rivera outing (for example) just seems so different.
June 10th, 2011 at 2:21 pm
625 feet? No. The longest home run all of last year was 485 feet, according to HitTracker.
June 10th, 2011 at 3:11 pm
Wow, I knew Eckersley had a decent career as an SP before become a closer but 100 CG's (as many as Randy Johnson) and 20 shutouts (3 more than Pedro)? Wow wow wow.
June 10th, 2011 at 3:20 pm
Looks like Rivera should have a good chance to pass Hoffman this year as career saves leader.
June 10th, 2011 at 7:08 pm
@8 I'm telling you man, Berkman's HR was so far it hit the top of the roof support in the lemonade dome beyond the right field stands. If you look at the angle, it is all most impossible to get a ball that's on a downward trajectory to hit that spot. I talked to someone at the game and they estimate the spot the ball hit would be 472' away from home plate, and that's if that spot was on the ground. The Cards had a big lead at the time and Lance was just swing at any pitch close. When he hit it he just hung his head like he was embarrassed.
June 11th, 2011 at 2:22 am
Eckersley completed almost a third of his starts.... impressive
June 11th, 2011 at 7:44 am
#1 and #4, the two major changes in the Save rule (there have been some minor adjustments):
1969: became an official stat
1974: some adjustments for merit (because too many managers were putting guys like John Hiller in to pitch to the last batter in a 15-2 game so they could fluff up their total)
I could try to cite original research but I won't
June 11th, 2011 at 8:14 am
That homer was a bomb, but it was a high arc. I'd be surprised if it gets estimated at more than 460 feet.
June 11th, 2011 at 10:39 am
@ Creif, Jimbo
In case you haven't realized by now, Timmy P is a troll. Ignore him.
June 11th, 2011 at 9:21 pm
Timmy is high entertainment. As long as he keeps switching up his material and doesn't harp on the Berkman homer for the next 2 weeks, I'm a fan.