Unexpected Winners
Posted by Raphy on December 14, 2009
In 2009 Bradon Looper went 14-7 despite posting an ERA+ of only 77. Looper's success, which can be attributed to a combination of extreme inconsistancy, run support and luck, was certainly unusual, but not unprecedented.
Yesterday we took a look at a group of pitchers who won a lot despite posting a less than stellar ERA+ . After I posted the list I began to wonder if we could do better. The list from yesterday lumps all the sub 100 ERA+ seasons together and doesn't differentiate between them. Jim Coates's 13-3 season is lumped together with Hooks Wiltse's 13-3 season, despite Wiltses's 96-83 advantage in ERA+. Therefore, I thought it might be interesting to look at the players with the best ratio of WL%:ERA+. I realize that there is a certain logical flaw in such a comparison, but I think the list is enlightening none-the -less. (To be included all pitchers must have pitched enough to qualify for the ERA title.)
Rk | Player | Year | W | L | Ratio | Tm | Lg | G | GS | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Braden Looper | 2009 | 14 | 7 | .667 | 77 | .00866 | MIL | NL | 34 | 34 | 194.2 | 226 | 123 | 113 | 64 | 100 | 5.22 |
2 | Storm Davis | 1989 | 19 | 7 | .731 | 85 | .00860 | OAK | AL | 31 | 31 | 169.1 | 187 | 91 | 82 | 68 | 91 | 4.36 |
3 | Dick Ruthven | 1981 | 12 | 7 | .632 | 70 | .00903 | PHI | NL | 23 | 22 | 146.2 | 162 | 94 | 84 | 54 | 80 | 5.15 |
4 | Dave Roberts | 1972 | 12 | 7 | .632 | 75 | .00843 | HOU | NL | 35 | 28 | 192.0 | 227 | 100 | 96 | 57 | 111 | 4.50 |
5 | Chuck Dobson | 1971 | 15 | 5 | .750 | 88 | .00852 | OAK | AL | 30 | 30 | 189.0 | 185 | 84 | 80 | 71 | 100 | 3.81 |
6 | Joe Bowman | 1944 | 12 | 8 | .600 | 71 | .00845 | BOS | AL | 26 | 24 | 168.1 | 175 | 95 | 90 | 64 | 53 | 4.81 |
7 | Red Causey | 1919 | 13 | 8 | .619 | 70 | .00884 | TOT | NL | 29 | 26 | 174.0 | 180 | 90 | 78 | 58 | 39 | 4.03 |
8 | Byron Houck | 1913 | 14 | 6 | .700 | 66 | .01061 | PHA | AL | 41 | 19 | 176.0 | 147 | 89 | 81 | 122 | 71 | 4.14 |
9 | Joe Bush | 1913 | 15 | 6 | .714 | 72 | .00992 | PHA | AL | 39 | 16 | 200.1 | 199 | 97 | 85 | 66 | 81 | 3.82 |
10 | Mike Lynch | 1905 | 17 | 8 | .680 | 79 | .00861 | PIT | NL | 33 | 22 | 206.1 | 191 | 102 | 87 | 107 | 106 | 3.79 |
11 | Hooks Wiltse | 1904 | 13 | 3 | .813 | 96 | .00847 | NYG | NL | 24 | 16 | 164.2 | 150 | 66 | 52 | 61 | 105 | 2.84 |
I have added the ratios to the original list, which is sorted by year. If you click on "ratio", it will sort the list in order.
The top two pitchers on the list were teammates for the World Champion 1913 A's. The best ratio since 1901 belongs to Byron Houck who went 14-6, despite posting an ERA+ of 66. Houck's teammate Joe Bush who went 15-6 with an ERA+ of 72 is second all-time. Both pitchers certainly benefited from their team's tremendous offense, which averaged 5.19 R/G, more than a full run more than any other team in the league.
Looper is 5th all-time, so he is obviously the leader in 2009.
Rk | W | L | Ratio | Age | Tm | Lg | G | GS | SV | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Joe Saunders | 16 | 7 | .696 | 98 | .00710 | 28 | LAA | AL | 31 | 31 | 0 | 186.0 | 202 | 102 | 95 | 64 | 101 | 4.60 |
2 | Andy Pettitte | 14 | 8 | .636 | 103 | .00617 | 37 | NYY | AL | 32 | 32 | 0 | 194.2 | 193 | 101 | 90 | 76 | 148 | 4.16 |
3 | Carl Pavano | 14 | 12 | .538 | 84 | .00640 | 33 | TOT | AL | 33 | 33 | 0 | 199.1 | 235 | 119 | 113 | 39 | 147 | 5.10 |
4 | Ricky Nolasco | 13 | 9 | .591 | 84 | .00704 | 26 | FLA | NL | 31 | 31 | 0 | 185.0 | 188 | 111 | 104 | 44 | 195 | 5.06 |
5 | Jamie Moyer | 12 | 10 | .545 | 86 | .00634 | 46 | PHI | NL | 30 | 25 | 0 | 162.0 | 177 | 91 | 89 | 43 | 94 | 4.94 |
6 | Derek Lowe | 15 | 10 | .600 | 88 | .00682 | 36 | ATL | NL | 34 | 34 | 0 | 194.2 | 232 | 109 | 101 | 63 | 111 | 4.67 |
7 | Braden Looper | 14 | 7 | .667 | 77 | .00866 | 34 | MIL | NL | 34 | 34 | 0 | 194.2 | 226 | 123 | 113 | 64 | 100 | 5.22 |
8 | Jorge de la Rosa | 16 | 9 | .640 | 104 | .00615 | 28 | COL | NL | 33 | 32 | 0 | 185.0 | 172 | 95 | 90 | 83 | 193 | 4.38 |
9 | Josh Beckett | 17 | 6 | .739 | 122 | .00606 | 29 | BOS | AL | 32 | 32 | 0 | 212.1 | 198 | 99 | 91 | 55 | 199 | 3.86 |
10 | Scott Baker | 15 | 9 | .625 | 100 | .00625 | 27 | MIN | AL | 33 | 33 | 0 | 200.0 | 190 | 99 | 97 | 48 | 162 | 4.37 |
The career leader in this category (min. 100 decisions) is Ferdie Schupp, who went 61-39 in his career despite an ERA+ of 88.
Rk | Player | W | L | To | From | G | GS | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bob Walk | 105 | 81 | .565 | 91 | .00621 | 1980 | 1993 | 350 | 259 | 1666.0 | 1671 | 829 | 746 | 606 | 848 | 4.03 | |
2 | Curt Young | 69 | 53 | .566 | 90 | .00629 | 1983 | 1993 | 251 | 162 | 1107.0 | 1133 | 581 | 530 | 366 | 536 | 4.31 | |
3 | Pedro Borbon | 69 | 39 | .639 | 101 | .00633 | 1969 | 1980 | 593 | 4 | 1026.2 | 1098 | 436 | 401 | 251 | 409 | 3.52 | |
4 | Tony Cloninger | 113 | 97 | .538 | 88 | .00611 | 1961 | 1972 | 352 | 247 | 1767.2 | 1643 | 898 | 799 | 798 | 1120 | 4.07 | |
5 | Vic Raschi | 132 | 66 | .667 | 105 | .00635 | 1946 | 1955 | 269 | 255 | 1819.0 | 1666 | 828 | 752 | 727 | 944 | 3.72 | |
6 | Roy Mahaffey | 67 | 49 | .578 | 90 | .00642 | 1926 | 1936 | 224 | 128 | 1056.0 | 1181 | 673 | 588 | 452 | 365 | 5.01 | |
7 | Ferdie Schupp | 61 | 39 | .610 | 88 | .00693 | 1913 | 1922 | 216 | 120 | 1054.0 | 938 | 470 | 389 | 464 | 553 | 3.32 | |
8 | Bernie Boland | 68 | 53 | .562 | 90 | .00624 | 1915 | 1921 | 209 | 119 | 1062.0 | 925 | 460 | 383 | 432 | 364 | 3.25 | |
9 | Lefty Williams | 82 | 48 | .631 | 99 | .00637 | 1913 | 1920 | 189 | 152 | 1186.0 | 1121 | 497 | 413 | 347 | 515 | 3.13 | |
10 | Jack Harper* | 79 | 59 | .572 | 92 | .00622 | 1901 | 1906 | 152 | 142 | 1176.2 | 1150 | 628 | 460 | 424 | 452 | 3.52 |
I have added the ratios to the original list, which is sorted by year. If you click on "ratio", it will sort the list in order.
* Harper's number are from 1901 and later. His actual career numbers are .556 WL%, 91 ERA+ and .00611 ratio.
On the flip side of "Unexpected Winners" are "Unexpected Losers". You can read more about them here.
December 14th, 2009 at 11:38 am
A reminder requested, please - Is a high ERA+ considered to be good or bad? Just a simple one word, "good" or "bad", will do. Please do not, instead, insert a link to an explanation of ERA+ for me (and anyone else who's wondering about this) to figure it out for myself. Thanks.
December 14th, 2009 at 11:55 am
Good
December 15th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
Raphy how did you include that custom field in the table?
December 15th, 2009 at 2:11 pm
After you post a table into WordPress and switch to visual mode, you can manually edit the entries of each cell. Just make sure you have an extra column that you're willing to type over.