This is our old blog. It hasn't been active since 2011. Please see the link above for our current blog or click the logo above to see all of the great data and content on this site.

Wade Boggs taking the first pitch

Posted by Andy on August 12, 2008

Reader thebest suggested I take a look at Wade Boggs and how well he did despite (or due to) often taking the first pitch.

Unfortunately, we have pitch-by-pitch data for plate appearances only from 1988 onward, and even then it's not totally complete. We miss the first bunch of years of Boggs' career. But let's see what we can learn from what data we have available. All of this information comes from Boggs' career splits for pitch data.

Firstly, just how often did Boggs really let the first pitch go by?

We can see that he had 367 plate appearances that ended on the first pitch. He had a .360 BA in those PAs, damn good even for Wade Boggs. He had 3418 PAs that ended sometime after the count went to 1-0. Clearly he took the first pitch in those cases. He had another 2905 PAs that ended sometime after the count went to 0-1. We don't know what fraction of these were taken strikes vs swings that resulted in foul balls. Lets examine the two extreme cases:

Imagine that in the 2905 PAs that had a count of 0-1, Boggs took a called strike every single time. That would mean that he took the first pitch a total of 3418 + 2905 = 6323 times, as compared to 367 times that he swung, meaning he swung only 5.5% of the time, which does indeed seem quite low. Imagine, instead, that in those 2905 PAs, he swung and hit a foul ball every time. That means he took the first pitch 3418 times, meaning he swung at the first pitch only 49.0% of the time.

I wish we knew how often he swung, but we just don't have the data available.

If Boggs truly did take the first pitch very often, then pitchers should really have made sure to throw him a strike. However, even if all those 2905 PAs with an 0-1 count were called strikes, they still threw him a strike less often than they threw a ball (as evidenced by the 3418 PAs with a 1-0 count.)

For comparison purposes, let's look at a couple of other players. First, the best comparison for Boggs is Tony Gwynn, in terms of type of hitter and era of career.

Gwynn (again, after 1988) swung at the first pitch in 1009 PAs. He had 3216 more that went to 1-0 and 2571 more that went to 0-1. The ratio of 1-0 to 0-1 PAs is very similar to that for Boggs, but Gwynn clearly swung at the first pitch a lot more. Using the same two types of extreme cases as above, Gwynn swung at the first offering between 14.8% and 52.7% of the time. When I say that Gwynn swung at the first pitch more often, I'm assuming that the two players had a similar ratio of called strikes vs foul balls on the 0-1 counts--and that may not be a valid assumption.

Let's check one more guy: Don Mattingly, who also had a reputation of taking the first pitch. After 1988, Mattingly had 465 PAs that ended on the first pitch. He had 2335 that went 1-0 and 1798 that went 0-1. That's a range of swinging at the first pitch of 10.1% to 49.2%.

All of these quick results ignores stuff like HBP, which obviously affects the total number of times a player swung or didn't swing.

5 Responses to “Wade Boggs taking the first pitch”

  1. thebest Says:

    Wow Andy, I greatly appreciate your indulgence -- thank you muchly. I remember watching Boggs, and being borderline-shocked with the frequency that pitchers would throw him first pitch balls. I always figured it was my psychology that made me focus on this tendency, but now I know that the stats bear it out.

    As I envisioned, throwing Boggs a first pitch ball was almost inexcusable. After a first pitch ball, Boggs hit a whopping .333, whereas his average dropped nearly 50 points to .286 following a first pitch strike. I am not sure how much this varies from other hitters in the league, but it's hard to see why any pitcher would want to mess with .333 unnecessarily.

    The comparisons with Mattingly and Gwynn were also quite interesting, and it makes free-swingers like Guerrero all the more impressive in my book. Vlad has a career average of .366 with PA's that end on the first pitch (though, I wonder if I'm reading the splits properly, since it appears he also walked twice on the first pitch).

    So, unless a pitcher is facing someone like Guerrero, it is difficult to understate the importance of throwing strike one. This sounds utterly asinine, but the frequency that these skilled hitters got ahead early in the count despite their reputation for taking strike one is just remarkable. Anyway, thanks again Andy!

  2. Johnny Twisto Says:

    From '88 on, Boggs swung at the 1st pitch 8% of the time. That rose over 10% in his last few seasons. Mattingly was 17% (again, higher in his last few seasons). Gwynn 23%. League average is around 31%.

  3. thebest Says:

    I am very surprised that the league average is that low.

  4. mikeyjax Says:

    Excellent work as always Andy, I really studied the splits for the 1st time ever. I've looked at them plenty but never really took the time to read IN-DEPTH, which leads to the question of how does a player get a hit (or 3 in Boggs' case) from a ball that was hit in Foul Territory. If I read the splits right, he went 3-68 in balls hit into Foul territory? Would this be like a ball bouncing off a corner infielder's glove or body into the area. Or maybe a pitcher?

    Thanks as always - the 88 Topps site is way cool too, have you determined your next project afterwards?

  5. Andy Says:

    Mikey, I would have to think that the foul ball data is only for foul balls that ended the at-bat. So mainly this would be fly balls or pop-ups that were caught in foul territory, or the rare hit that glanced off a fielder, landed foul, but counted as a base hit. (For example, we see this time to time when a hitter pulls a sharp line drive down the line, the 1B or 3B gets a glove on it, but it ricochets off and lands in the outfield in foul territory, but for a hit.)

    As for my blog, 88 Topps Cards, once we finish the regular 1988 Topps set, we will then post the 88 Topps Traded set on the same blog. After that, later this year, I will be doing the 1978 Topps set!!