This is our old blog. It hasn't been active since 2011. Please see the link above for our current blog or click the logo above to see all of the great data and content on this site.

Extreme Home Field (Dis)Advantage

Posted by Raphy on May 27, 2010

This season the  Oakland A's and New York Mets have taken home field advantage to the extreme. Both teams sport impressive 18-9 records at home and embarrassing 6-14 records on the road. This is obviously something that will even out over the course of the season. However, they both currently sit atop the leader board for the biggest difference in home winning percentage vs. road winning percentage.  Here are the all time leaders:

Rank Team Year Home Wins Home Losses WP% Road Wins Road Losses WP% Difference
1 NYM 2010 18 9 0.667 6 14 0.300 0.367
2 OAK 2010 18 9 0.667 6 14 0.300 0.367
3 PHA 1945 39 35 0.527 13 63 0.171 0.356
4 PHA 1902 56 17 0.767 27 36 0.429 0.339
5 BOS 1949 61 16 0.792 35 42 0.455 0.338
6 COL 1996 55 26 0.679 28 53 0.346 0.333
7 MIN 1987 56 25 0.691 29 52 0.358 0.333
8 HOU 1978 50 31 0.617 24 57 0.296 0.321
9 PHA 1908 46 30 0.605 22 55 0.286 0.320
10 CHW 1903 41 28 0.594 19 49 0.279 0.315
11 CHW 1902 48 20 0.706 26 40 0.394 0.312
12 BOS 1952 50 27 0.649 26 51 0.338 0.312
13 CHC 1933 56 23 0.709 30 45 0.400 0.309
14 PHA 1949 52 25 0.675 29 48 0.377 0.299
15 COL 2003 49 32 0.605 25 56 0.309 0.296
16 BOS 1961 50 31 0.617 26 55 0.321 0.296
17 FLA 1996 52 29 0.642 28 53 0.346 0.296
18 CHW 1972 55 23 0.705 32 44 0.421 0.284
19 HOU 1990 49 32 0.605 26 55 0.321 0.284
20 HOU 1967 46 35 0.568 23 58 0.284 0.284

On the opposite end of the spectrum are Milwaukee and Tampa who have played much better on the road than at home. For the time being, both sit 1-2 atop the leader board for the biggest difference in road winning percentage vs. home winning percentage. Here are the all-time leaders:

Rank Team Year Home Wins Home Losses WP% Road Wins Road Losses WP% Difference
1 MIL 2010 5 15 0.250 13 13 0.500 -0.250
2 TBR 2010 13 10 0.565 19 5 0.792 -0.226
3 CHC 1994 20 39 0.339 29 25 0.537 -0.198
4 PIT 1908 42 35 0.545 56 21 0.727 -0.182
5 KCR 1998 29 51 0.363 43 38 0.531 -0.168
6 BRO 1948 36 41 0.468 48 29 0.623 -0.156
7 PHA 1948 36 41 0.468 48 29 0.623 -0.156
8 BOS 1980 36 45 0.444 47 32 0.595 -0.150
9 KCR 1981 19 28 0.404 31 25 0.554 -0.149
10 CIN 2001 27 54 0.333 39 42 0.481 -0.148
11 STL 1928 42 35 0.545 53 24 0.688 -0.143
12 BSN 1923 22 55 0.286 32 45 0.416 -0.130
13 CHW 1912 34 43 0.442 44 33 0.571 -0.130
14 CIN 1972 42 34 0.553 53 25 0.679 -0.127
15 CHC 1909 47 29 0.618 57 20 0.740 -0.122
16 OAK 1971 46 35 0.568 55 25 0.688 -0.120
17 LAD 1970 39 42 0.481 48 32 0.600 -0.119
18 MIL 1999 32 48 0.400 42 39 0.519 -0.119
19 WSH 1960 32 45 0.416 41 36 0.532 -0.117
20 SDP 1972 26 54 0.325 32 41 0.438 -0.113
Resources:  Home and road records are readily available using the PI Situational Records tool.

9 Responses to “Extreme Home Field (Dis)Advantage”

  1. Evan Nelson Says:

    A popup ad with an autoplay noise? Come on, b-ref. That ain't cool. I'M AT WORK, TRYING TO READ YOUR BLOG QUIETLY.

  2. Gerry Says:

    "All-time" apparently means "since 1901." In 1897, Cleveland was 49-16, .754 at home but 20-46, .303 on the road, for a .451 differential, dwarfing anything in the table above. See also New York 1893, Louisville 1885, Boston 1895, etc., etc. See the post by Patrick Rock to the Usenet newsgroup rec.sport.baseball, Subject: Home/road splits, 18 August 2000.

  3. Atlas Says:

    I'll second the comment made by #1. That was really low-class.

  4. Raphy Says:

    As always, Gerry, you are correct. The situational records tool only goes back to 1901.

    "See the post by Patrick Rock to the Usenet newsgroup rec.sport.baseball, Subject: Home/road splits, 18 August 2000."

    Where can I find that?

  5. Jeff Says:

    The 45 A's are third on the first list, while the 48 A's are 7th on the second list. Both played at Shibe park. Interesting.....

  6. Gerry Says:

    Raphy, with any luck, posts to Usenet newsgroups are archived at Google Groups. You can go to Google, select groups from the drop-down menu under more, go to advanced search, ask for posts with splits in the subject header, from between 16 and 20 August 2000. Other variations on that procedure should also work.

    If you don't want to go through all that, just try http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.sport.baseball/browse_thread/thread/5f9e1e827b6e0faa/2caad5015be9f97a?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=insubject%3Asplits&pli=1

  7. Raphy Says:

    Thanks Gerry!

  8. Ray Says:

    Connie Mack's A's perfected the techniques later employed by the Padres and the Marlins to annoy and alienate their fans, developing talent then waving byebye when it became more costly than they could support in the matter to which it was accustomed.

  9. Kahuna Tuna Says:

    Not surprising to see two teams from the 1902 AL in the top ten of full-season home winning percentage compared to road winning percentage. The 1902 AL averaged a home winning record of 42-25 and a road winning record of 25-42 for an average home/road split of .254, by far the highest figure of the 20th Century. All AL teams except Boston had a home/road split of at least .207.

    To follow up on Gerry's comment about pre-1900 home/road splits being larger, the NL average split was at least .219 every year from 1893 to 1897, and the 1890 NL average league difference was .262. The largest home/road split I've been able to find is .273 for the 1885 American Association. (Actually the 1877 NL figure was larger, but those teams played 60-game schedules.) Four teams from the 1885 AA had home/road splits above .300, from Baltimore at .305 to Louisville at .375 (as noted by Gerry in #2 above).