The Steroids Era is Over
Posted by Andy on May 7, 2010
This article is not the long, detailed discussion you might expect. I've just noticed the incredibly low HR totals a few teams have:
Rk | PA | H | 2B | 3B | HR â–´ | RBI | TB | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SEA | 1040 | 213 | 44 | 5 | 10 | 86 | .230 | .302 | .321 | .623 | 297 |
2 | HOU | 986 | 211 | 40 | 4 | 11 | 77 | .232 | .277 | .321 | .598 | 292 |
3 | CLE | 1025 | 217 | 51 | 3 | 15 | 90 | .242 | .327 | .356 | .683 | 319 |
4 | ATL | 1067 | 215 | 46 | 2 | 18 | 107 | .237 | .334 | .351 | .685 | 319 |
5 | OAK | 1085 | 245 | 49 | 4 | 19 | 123 | .253 | .320 | .371 | .692 | 359 |
6 | WSN | 1067 | 239 | 62 | 11 | 22 | 118 | .255 | .331 | .415 | .746 | 389 |
7 | SDP | 1083 | 231 | 42 | 7 | 23 | 120 | .245 | .327 | .377 | .705 | 356 |
8 | NYM | 1080 | 221 | 41 | 11 | 23 | 108 | .236 | .316 | .377 | .693 | 353 |
9 | DET | 1141 | 282 | 76 | 5 | 24 | 128 | .280 | .357 | .437 | .794 | 440 |
10 | FLA | 1093 | 258 | 53 | 2 | 24 | 127 | .264 | .330 | .395 | .725 | 387 |
11 | TEX | 1098 | 247 | 45 | 5 | 24 | 125 | .253 | .321 | .382 | .703 | 374 |
12 | SFG | 1044 | 254 | 56 | 5 | 25 | 116 | .276 | .342 | .429 | .771 | 395 |
13 | PIT | 1068 | 227 | 46 | 3 | 25 | 100 | .240 | .314 | .374 | .688 | 354 |
14 | LAA | 1100 | 253 | 59 | 1 | 26 | 114 | .254 | .317 | .394 | .711 | 392 |
15 | COL | 1092 | 251 | 57 | 8 | 27 | 131 | .261 | .338 | .422 | .760 | 405 |
16 | LAD | 1127 | 276 | 56 | 7 | 28 | 138 | .279 | .349 | .435 | .783 | 430 |
17 | TBR | 1102 | 255 | 64 | 6 | 28 | 163 | .264 | .343 | .429 | .772 | 415 |
18 | KCR | 1122 | 281 | 48 | 7 | 28 | 118 | .277 | .332 | .421 | .754 | 427 |
19 | MIN | 1164 | 275 | 54 | 7 | 29 | 137 | .273 | .359 | .427 | .787 | 430 |
20 | BAL | 1088 | 244 | 49 | 3 | 29 | 94 | .246 | .309 | .390 | .699 | 386 |
21 | MIL | 1154 | 274 | 61 | 9 | 30 | 148 | .273 | .356 | .441 | .797 | 443 |
22 | CIN | 1057 | 225 | 35 | 7 | 30 | 112 | .241 | .314 | .391 | .704 | 364 |
23 | STL | 1135 | 260 | 59 | 3 | 31 | 118 | .259 | .336 | .417 | .753 | 418 |
24 | PHI | 1093 | 258 | 62 | 6 | 33 | 145 | .268 | .339 | .448 | .788 | 431 |
25 | NYY | 1057 | 252 | 45 | 10 | 34 | 141 | .276 | .364 | .458 | .822 | 419 |
26 | CHC | 1128 | 265 | 48 | 5 | 34 | 132 | .270 | .342 | .432 | .775 | 425 |
27 | CHW | 1070 | 211 | 40 | 2 | 38 | 108 | .225 | .310 | .393 | .703 | 369 |
28 | BOS | 1156 | 280 | 71 | 2 | 40 | 146 | .275 | .351 | .467 | .818 | 475 |
29 | ARI | 1146 | 278 | 66 | 5 | 41 | 158 | .274 | .349 | .470 | .819 | 477 |
30 | TOR | 1141 | 243 | 83 | 5 | 43 | 138 | .239 | .313 | .457 | .770 | 465 |
TOT | 32809 | 7441 | 1608 | 160 | 812 | 3666 | .257 | .331 | .408 | .739 | 11805 |
The Mariners are on pace to hit 58 HR this season and the Astros are on pace for 64. Look at the season totals from, for example, 1998. The lowly Pirates hit 107 HR while the new and terrible Rays hit 111. The low teams in 2010 are way below those benchmarks. In 2009, the awful Mets had the lowest total but still managed 95 HR.
Of course, it's likely that the Mariners and Astros will both revert to the mean a little bit and hit HR at a faster pace for the rest of the season. (Not necessarily, though. After all, the Blue Jays are leading the league and on pace for 232 HR, similar to the Yankees' league-leading total of 244 last year and the Rangers' and Phillies' second-place totals of 224.)
Here's a little more info to put in perspective just how bad the HR hitting has been for Seattle and Houston so far:
- Paul Konerko has more HR himself than the Mariners or Astros have as a team, and 3 other guys have as many HR as the Mariners.
- Of the Astros' 11 home runs, 4 came with the bases empty and 7 were two-runs shots. They have no 3-runs homers or grand slams so far this season.
May 7th, 2010 at 12:07 pm
I heard a commentator on MLB network the other night (I forget which one) make the comment that he couldn't remember a time with this many dominant starters in the league. Sure, there are still some serious depth problems for some teams. But I would bolster your observation by pointing to the sheer number of starters with sub 2.00 and sub 3.00 early this season. I, for one, am happy to see more quality pitching and less football scores.
May 7th, 2010 at 12:13 pm
The last team to have as few as 10 home runs in their first 28 games was Boston in 1992.
Here are the teams with the fewest home run games in their first 28 since 1990. The number refers to players with home run games. Multiple home run games are only counted as 1. Therefore, Boston 1992 is actually 10, not 9.
Generated 5/7/2010.
May 7th, 2010 at 1:03 pm
Part of this COULD be weather related, we'll have to see what happens as it starts getting hot around the country.
But yes, it does appear likely that the days of teams averaging 180 home runs or more in a season are over. Steroids will never be completely eliminated from the game, but random testing combined with a few 50 game suspensions has absolutely had an impact, no question.
May 7th, 2010 at 1:05 pm
I, for one, am finding baseball more exciting now than ever. Low-scoring games are more suspenseful and a well-pitched game is a lot more impressive than a HR. I love it.
May 7th, 2010 at 1:23 pm
The overall home run rate is not much lower than it was in 2007-2008. Its the hits that have disappeared.
Generated 5/7/2010.
May 7th, 2010 at 1:25 pm
Raphy how did you make that table?
May 7th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/AL/bat.shtml
May 7th, 2010 at 1:53 pm
The 2010 singles rate of 5.64 per game is the second lowest of any year since 1901, higher than only 1968 (!). On the other hand, the 2010 doubles rate of 1.94 per game is tied with the 1936 rate for the highest ever.
Are MLB batters playing by a "no dinks" rule?
May 7th, 2010 at 6:12 pm
I agree with Andy, long live the triple!!! :p
I didn't know Toronto was leading the pack so far. Maybe they'll finish with a decent win/loss % this year. They won't be first but finishing above .500 with what they have would be nice.
May 7th, 2010 at 6:26 pm
Since 1960, the lowest home run team totals (for complete seasons only) are the 1979 Astros (NL), with 49, and the 1975 Angels (AL), with 55. Doesn't seem we're on pace to reach either of these lows. Even less the lower totals of the 50s and other decades before that, of course.
May 7th, 2010 at 7:58 pm
The Astros have a .598 OPS? As a team? Sweet merciful Zeus.
May 7th, 2010 at 8:27 pm
Andy et al.
Jamie Moyer pitched a beauty tonight, Complete 2 hit shutout of the braves. Not bad for a 47 year old. Is he the oldest person to throw a complete game... or even better a complete game shutout?
May 7th, 2010 at 8:56 pm
If I'm not mistaken, Moyer is... Only 2 other pitchers threw complete game shutouts after their 45th birthday: Charlie Hough and Phil Niekro.
Hough did it on June 14, 1994, beating the Cardinals 7-0 at Busch Stadium and he was 46 years + 5 months + 9 days old on that day.
Niekro shut out the Blue Jays 8-0 in Toronto on October 6th, last day of the 1985 season. Then he was 46 years + 6 months + 5 days old.
Tonight, Moyer is 47 years + 5 months + 19 days old.
May 8th, 2010 at 1:26 am
You guys must not have watched the Angels-Red Sox game last night. The Sox won 11-6 and it was one of the worst games that I've ever seen.
I believe that there were close to 200 total pitches thrown and 11 or 12 walks. Daise Matusaka walked 3 guys in the 1st inning, allowed 4 runs and the that half inning must have taken 1 hour.
But the reliever the Angels used in the 6th and 7th innings(I don't know his name) was worse than Dice-K. It seemed like ever 2nd pitch that this guy threw bounced before the ball got to home plate.
I like the quick paced, 3-2, 4-3 games too. But that game last night proved that is still work to be done.
May 8th, 2010 at 10:43 am
Although I've been reading and hearing in several places since last night that Moyer was the oldest major leaguer to pitch a complete game shutout, it just hit me that he is the only non-knuckleballer to do this past his 45th birthday.